News Home

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

East Bay Energy Consortium: what happened and what is next  

Credit:  By Olga Enger, Middletown Patch | middletown.patch.com 15 June 2012 ~~

In 2009, the East Bay Energy Consortium (EBEC) was founded in order to explore the feasibility of combining resources across the nine East Bay municipal lines, in order to invest in assets and technologies for renewable energy sources. A bill to establish the group as a non-profit governmental entity, passed the Senate, but last week it was held before it got to the House.

The House Environment and Natural Resources Committee determined it should be “held for further study,” which essentially, killed the bill.

“It was a bit of a disappointment that it didn’t come out of the committee to be heard on the floor,” said Jeanne-Marie Napolitano, Chair of the EBEC Board. Napolitano also serves as a City Council member for Newport.

The Board will meet within a month to determine next steps and Napolitano said she would like to see the board decide to reintroduce the bill. She said although there were originally valid concerns, several revisions addressed the major issues.

“We all had concerns,” said State Senator Louis DiPalma, who introduced the bill in the Senate. He said if the EBEC approved, he would also like to reintroduce the bill.

DiPalma said the majority of the concerns arose after the recent news that 38 Studios defaulted on a $75 million loan to the EDC. The Consortium was first proposed as a subsidiary of the EDC, which raised concerns that if they defaulted on their loans, Rhode Island taxpayers would be held liable once again.

DiPalma said the language was changed so that the Consortium would be a stand-alone entity and would be responsible for its own debts.

The new language was modeled almost word for word after the Rhode Island Interlocal Trust (“The Trust”), which is an intergovernmental insurance risk-sharing pool.

“Think of it as a blueprint,” said the Senator. “It is a two page bill,” he said.

Napolitano said since the concerns had been addressed, it was important to educate Representatives, so they would understand Rhode Island taxpayers were no longer liable. She said only a handful of legislators attended an informative breakfast that was held to explain the changes.

Another educational opportunity was lost when they were not allowed to testify at the last hearing; a decision that she attributed to a “mystery letter” from Governor Lincoln Chafee that a board member found on the packets prepared for the legislators.

The Governors letter read, “There is language in the legislation that I cannot support, including creating EBEC as a subsidiary of the Economic Development Corporation and the potential financial exposure the State would be Subject to regarding the bond financing of this project.”

DiPalma said the letter was probably a “contributing factor” in the decision to remove the EBEC’s testimony that day.

“It was very obvious he had not seen the new legislation,” said Napolitano. “It’s very unusual to come in and try to kill something like that.” She said after waiting two and a half hours, they were taken “right off” the agenda.

Four days later, the Office of the Governor’s Office wrote Napolitano an email that he supported the bill now that it was modeled after the Rhode Island Interlocal Trust.

“I always felt that he was a Governor who believed in renewable energy,” said Napolitano.

DiPalma said one rumor he had heard was that resident’s electricity bills would become more expensive. He clarified that and other rumors were not accurate, because the bill did go into detail of the types of technologies or particular by-laws. It established the group as a legal governmental entity, similar to how a new business would incorporate, he explained.

The intent of the group is to not only invest in renewable energy, but also save cities and towns money, said DiPalma.

“My goal is to interact with the group and bring it back in January, in some way, shape or form,” he said.

Source:  By Olga Enger, Middletown Patch | middletown.patch.com 15 June 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.