[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Flawed solution to our energy problems  

Credit:  The Block Island Times | block-island.villagesoup.com 9 June 2012 ~~

I am hopeful that many Block Island Times readers were able to read a recent front page article in the New London Day with regard to the proposed wind farm. The writer apparently spent most of her time interviewing [First Warden] Kim Gaffett and [Electric Utility Task Group Chair] Barbara MacMullan, both avid wind farm supporters, and thus there is a definite wind farm bias in the article. However, for some semblance of balance, reference was made to certain concerns of wind farm opponents. For example, there was a visual comparison of the height of the turbines to the Empire State Building and the Washington Monument, which has to be very unsettling, even to the most rabid proponents. An interesting but subtle aside in the article was the mention that the coast of Connecticut was apparently devoid of wind, which means that Connecticut residents can apparently travel to Block Island for their visual shock.
The above article made me retreat to the November 6, 2010, Times and an article written by Brent Lang. The article references the initial Public Utilities Commission rejection of the wind farm project and quotes PUC Commissioner, Paul Roberti, as saying that the wind farm was a flawed solution to the island’s electricity woes, and the PUC would initiate an investigation into the construction of a transmission line between Block Island and the mainland. Also at that time my conversation with U.S. Sen. Jack Reed’s office indicated the he would support a transmission line.
It is indeed unfortunate that the PUC was forced by the then governor and General Assembly (with the support of First Warden Gaffett) to reverse their well-thought-out rejection, and here we sit, as Mr. Roberti stated, embracing a very flawed solution to our energy problems.
Based upon what has transpired over the last few years, it is difficult to believe this: that if we had leadership on Block Island that was properly focused on reducing electricity costs, such as what occurred on Nantucket and Martha’s Vineyard with a cable, as opposed to advocating an off the grid ideology for the smallest town in the smallest state, Block Island would be well on its way to energy cost resolution with a stand-alone cable as opposed to being mired in this Deepwater Wind controversy.
Terry Mooney
High Street

Source:  The Block Island Times | block-island.villagesoup.com 9 June 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.



Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

National Wind Watch