[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Senator issues warning on wind farm developments 

Credit:  The Border Watch, www.borderwatch.com.au 5 June 2012 ~~

Independent Senator Nick Xenophon has issued a warning to local councils that they could face “massive” liability claims from disgruntled ratepayers over wind farm developments.

Speaking at Grant District Council on Monday night during a whistle-stop visit to Mount Gambier, Mr Xenophon warned the issue was a “legal minefield” for local government authorities.

Denying his brief stopover in Mount Gambier was a ploy to gain media attention, he claimed he was deeply worried that councils could be hit with millions of dollars in compensation pay-outs.

Speaking to councillors and a number of concerned residents in the gallery, the senator – who planned to return to Mount Gambier next week – said he had received some advice from a barrister on the issue.

He said councils faced possible legal nuisance claims through the courts, particularly regarding infrasound emulating from turbines that impacts on brain activity.

“There is a growing body of evidence that there could be potential liability,” said Mr Xenophon, who was flanked by councillors in the chamber.

Explaining he was a former suburban injuries lawyer and not an expert on these legal matters, he said a case in the United Kingdom over nuisance issues was settled out of court.

He called on Grant Council – which has been at the heart of controversial wind farm developments – to seek its own legal advice about its potential liability flowing from decisions being made by its independent development assessment panel.

While the proposed $170m wind farm at Allendale East has hit a legal wall, council has a number of turbines operating in its district as well as an active planning application for a wind farm near Port MacDonnell.

“Councils need to take a precautionary approach,” Mr Xenophon said.

“My gut feeling is that is going to be a minefield for litigation.”

He said nuisance claims over infrasound was an emerging issue for residents living near turbines, which in Australia were bigger and more imposing than in United Kingdom.

“If they come at the expensive of massive litigation and forcing people out of their homes, then that’s a real issue,” the senator said.

“If people are cranky about their amenity, they then could take it on.”

While backing green energy developments, he warned that it was not sensible to “put too many eggs in the wind farm basket” and other developments such as tidal and gemo-thermal should be explored.

Speaking to The Border Watch yesterday, Grant District Mayor Richard Sage praised Mr Xenophon for taking an interest in regional issues in the South East, including wind farms.

Regarding fears over liability, Mr Sage said the State and Federal Government must determine a nationwide framework for wind farms.

“They need to look at all of the issues,” the mayor said.

He argued council could alter its development plan to provide tighter guidelines for wind farms, but warned the State Government could override them.

Conceding council had been subjected to criticism over wind farm developments, he said council’s hands had “been tied behind its back” and had faced difficult decisions.

Meanwhile, at Monday ‘s council meeting, Cr Graham Slarks said wind farms have been an arduous issue for council given the decisions were made by its independent panel.

He said councillors on the assessment panel were confronted with trying to work out how they could stop wind farm developments because of the objections.

At the meeting, Cr Alan Hill also expressed his ongoing frustration about the fact councillors could not stop wind farm approvals and had to publicly defend decisions made by its independent panel.

“I don’t want to sound like it is a cop-out – this council has never voted on wind farms and had to defend it by law,” Cr Hill said.

Source:  The Border Watch, www.borderwatch.com.au 5 June 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky