[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Some wind farms can dodge setback rule  

Credit:  The Courier | www.thecourier.com.au 1 June 2012 ~~

Re Katherine Smyrk’s letter (May 24), I agree with her entirely when she laments the lack of community consultation regarding Mantle Mining Company’s exploration.

This seems to be the acceptable way in which governments of both persuasions manage to get their projects approved. When West Wind Energy’s Moorabool Wind Farm was planned, community consultation was carried out, a planning panel was conducted then the recommendations of the panel were promptly ignored as the project had to be approved, no matter what the cost to those unfortunate enough to live adjacent to 150m-high turbines, well within 2km of their homes.

Ms Smyrk questions how a wind turbine placement can be refused if it is within 2km of a house.

The following information was taken from the Department of Primary Industries website Wind Projects, last updated August 24, 2011.

In Victoria, there are already nine wind farms operating with a total of 300 turbines.

In theory a total of 494.70mW should be generated.

There are a further 27 approved developments with a total of 1235 wind generators which, also in theory, will produce 3088.20mW.

None of these developments are subject to the VC82 amendment which requires a 2km setback from people’s homes unless they give written permission to the proponents.

It is obvious that Victoria already has a large number of wind farms that are legally able to go ahead under their existing approved permits. Feasibility studies are also listed for a further 13 wind farms.

The claim that adjacent landowners can stop a project from going ahead is false and misleading. This ruling will only apply to new projects.

Angela Kearns


Source:  The Courier | www.thecourier.com.au 1 June 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.