[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

when your community is targeted


RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Peru gets rundown from wind ordinance panel 

Credit:  Mary Standard, Special to the Sun Journal | www.sunjournal.com 29 May 2012 ~~

PERU – Nearly 60 people attended a hearing by the Wind Ordinance Committee on Tuesday night to hear the pros and cons of wind power development.

A straw vote on the issue will be held in June.

Chairman Bill Hine said the committee has been working for 15 months to draft a wind power ordinance to govern potential developments. If the town has no ordinance, state regulations would apply.

EDP Renewables North America, LLC, of Houston, Texas, is considering building 25 to 35 turbines here, a representative told the committee earlier this year. The company received a permit in October 2011 to place a meteorological test tower off Black Mountain Road near the Sumner town line.

Hine said the mission of the committee is to develop an ordinance that addresses residents’ concerns and the potential impact to public health, welfare and quality of life. Key provisions are noise limits, where to measure the noise level, landowner waivers and operational license, complaint protocol and decommissioning plans.

Hine showed the state’s noise guidelines as 55 decibels daytime and 42 nighttime. The guidelines have no provisions for waivers, license or complaints, and no decommissioning plan.

Rumford’s ordinance stipulates 50 decibels for daytime and 40 at night. Developers need to renew their license every five years.

Sumner’s ordinance has a decibel level of 35 for day and night. Developers must renew their license every three years and the code enforcement officer monitors complaints. Developers must post a performance bond before any turbines are built.

Hine said the committee was concerned with noise, visual impact and shadow flicker, the impact on wildlife and property values, as well as electrical pollution.

Benefits of wind power include payment to landowners, temporary jobs during construction and more tax revenue. However, with higher valuation for the towns school costs which would go up.

Judy Drury cautioned people to “be really, really sure about something that will affect us forever and ever.”

Steve Drury passed out a flier that said if people agreed to wind power developments the landscape will be changed forever and they will have to live with the noise, flicker and mountaintop destruction, face potential health hazards and the impact on wildlife habitats. He requested people be informed before voting and go to www.friendsofmainemountains.org.

Source:  Mary Standard, Special to the Sun Journal | www.sunjournal.com 29 May 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)


e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon