[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Objections were just copies 

Credit:  Isle of Wight County Press, www.iwcp.co.uk 11 May 2012 ~~

I was very surprised by the articles “No to offshore wind park” and “Yes to onshore plan” (CP, 04-05-12), as letters of objection to wind farms, particularly onshore, usually considerably outnumber letters of support.
Had the letters of support been read, it would have been seen that 450 of them were on identical photocopied forms, distinguishable only by a handwritten sender’s name and address added to the forms. More than ten per cent of them had no legible name, so should not have been accepted. It is clear the forms were not initiated or composed by those who signed them.
By simply counting the number of comments on each side, the author of the article has drawn a conclusion that is very one-sided. Had the 450 photocopies been counted as one, as would be a petition, the percentage quoted for the second consultation would have been 85 per cent opposed, not 81 per cent in support. Moreover, the headline would have read “No to onshore plan” as the majority of all comments received for the application would have been objections.
I cannot accept the value of a comment, be it in support or objection, is proportional to the number of times it is photocopied, or a considered objection based on material planning considerations from a resident at risk of giant industrial wind turbines within a few hundred metres of their home equates in value to a comment of approval from a more distant Island resident merely signing a photocopied document.

From Dr J. V. Yelland, Newport

Source:  Isle of Wight County Press, www.iwcp.co.uk 11 May 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky