[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Fairhaven health board will create town-run turbine complaint process  

Credit:  By ARIEL WITTENBERG, www.southcoasttoday.com 25 April 2012 ~~

FAIRHAVEN – The Board of Health agreed to create a town-run turbine complaint process after more than two dozen wind opponents filled a Town Hall hearing room Tuesday night.

No method or form was agreed upon during the meeting but board members said they hope to come up with one before the turbines turn on sometime next week.

Prior to the meeting, members of WindWise had expressed fears that complaints would be lodged directly with the turbines’ developer, leaving residents in the dark about the scope and extent of health complaints once the turbines are activated.

Those fears were exacerbated when the spokesman for the turbines’ developer, Fairhaven Wind LLC, was seated at the table with the Health Board.

WindWise members, who sat in the audience, said they attended thinking they would have a say in creating the complaint process.

Instead, the meeting opened with Health Board Chairman Peter DeTerra asking Fairhaven Wind’s Sumul Shah to explain his company’s complaint process. Shah said Fairhaven Wind already has a website and phone number in place for residents to lodge complaints.

“There is no one-size-fits-all solution for every type of comment but we will explore what’s appropriate,” Shah said. Shah also said he envisioned submitting quarterly reports to the Board of Health to let it know the number of and nature of complaints but not the names or locations of complaining residents. He called that “proprietary information.”

Health Board member Dr. Barbara Acksen took exception. “The complaints should go through us and then maybe we can include the developer in them,” Acksen said. “To protect our citizens, we need it to go to us first.”

Acksen further countered that “quarterly reports (are) way too few and far between.”

“We need to know simultaneously what you know,” DeTerra said. “If not before.”

Shah said noise complaints can often be a sign that something is not working correctly within the turbines but that his company would not routinely monitor the turbines for noise unless there was an excess of noise complaints. Any information gained from noise monitoring he again called “proprietary information” that would not be shared with town officials.

WindWise member Ken Pottel said many of WindWise’s health concerns about the turbines stem from issues relating to noise, such as sleep deprivation and migraine headaches.

Shah “might be looking to change something if the turbines aren’t working, but when they are working properly we think there will be serious health concerns,” Pottel said. “You are the Board of Health; you represent us. We need you to know what’s going on.”

Karen Isherwood, who lives near the turbines, said she had already experienced adverse health effects from the few hours of testing that took place over the weekend and was concerned that a complaint process wasn’t in place before testing began.

“It’s the constant woosh, woosh, woosh,” she said. “I couldn’t sit in my house for four hours Saturday and they are not even turned on permanently.”

Source:  By ARIEL WITTENBERG, www.southcoasttoday.com 25 April 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.