[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Farmington selectmen take another look at wind energy ordinance 

Credit:  By David F. Robinson, Staff Writer, Morning Sentinel, www.onlinesentinel.com ~~

FARMINGTON – Selectmen will decide tonight whether they should ask voters to amend a recently adopted ordinance that regulates wind energy projects in town.

They were prompted to readdress the issue after some residents complained the local performance standards fail to protect them from negative effects of wind turbines. Voters overwhelmingly passed the ordinance at town meeting last month.

Resident Burt Knapp has been the most outspoken advocate for adjusting the standards, calling on town officials to adopt stricter regulations.

He recently submitted a letter asking selectmen to bring the ordinance back to voters to adopt amendments at a special town meeting, according to Town Manager Richard Davis.

Selectmen will consider his request at their regular meeting at 6:30 tonight in the town office. There is an ordinance clause that allows selectmen by a majority vote to ask residents to consider adopting amendments, Davis said.

Knapp, a physician, told selectmen his biggest concern is the amount of turbine noise that the ordinance deems acceptable at neighbors’ property lines.

“I think it’s good that the town did pass an ordinance, but it doesn’t fit the bill to properly protect the health and safety of residents,” he said Monday.

Selectman Andrew Hufnagel on Monday said he is aware of the issues raised by Knapp and remains undecided on whether an amendment is necessary. He noted that town officials behind the new ordinance have defended the regulations, while staying open to possibly making changes if problems arise.

“It seems to me we’re really not going to know where we sit until a project comes to Farmington,” he said.

Knapp countered Monday that it would be too late to make an amendment once a wind energy project application is submitted. A project’s permit will be regulated by the rules in place at that time, he said.

Hufnagel would not disclose how he plans to vote, saying he will listen to Knapp and make a decision based on the discussion tonight.

Selectman Dennis Pike on Monday said he will probably oppose the request to amend the ordinance, unless Knapp has new evidence beyond what he presented last month.

“I was very satisfied with the ordinance passed last month, but I will keep an open mind about the issue,” Pike said.

Before the ordinance was passed, Knapp made a lengthy presentation at Town Meeting about his concerns and failed to convince voters to defeat the ordinance.

The other three selectmen did not return calls Monday.

The new local performance standards added rules for turbine noise, setbacks and other wind-energy issues to the town’s zoning ordinance. It allows 60 decibels of turbine noise at a neighbors’ property line, which is higher than the local ordinance standards enacted by many other communities.

The 60-decibel level is considered the level of normal conversation and often accepted as the standard in many noise ordinance debates. For instance, Augusta recently accepted it as the level at which car dealers’ loudspeakers could be heard at the border of their property.

Knapp, however, has argued a rural community such as Farmington should have stricter guidelines for noise ordinances, especially for rules tied to wind turbines. He noted Phillips, another slightly more rural community in Franklin County, adopted a 30-decibel level in its version of a wind energy ordinance.

Farmington Planning Board member Tom Eastler has argued that Phillips’ rule on turbine noise is meant to prevent wind energy projects entirely, rather than regulating them.

Eastler is a geology professor at University of Maine at Farmington and has been the most outspoken supporter of the town’s ordinance, which he helped write.

Source:  By David F. Robinson, Staff Writer, Morning Sentinel, www.onlinesentinel.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky