[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

British royals charged with wind farm hypocrisy 

Credit:  By Monami Thakur, International Business Times, www.ibtimes.co.uk 21 April 2012 ~~

Members of the British royal family have been accused of hypocrisy for utilising the Crown Estate lands for the installation of 45 windmills despite such wind farms being criticised earlier by the Prince of Wales and the Duke of Edinburgh.

The Crown Estate has already given the green light to German company RWE for the installation of four turbines at Neuadd Goch in Powys and to energy firm RES for building 15 turbines at Bryn Llywelyn in Carmarthenshire.

The Telegraph reported that E On has also been offered a lease for 17 turbines at Billingborough in Lincolnshire, plans for which are under public consultation.

As per media reports, the proposed wind turbines will provide around 1 million pounds per year to the royal family.

This move has sparked a controversy among those residing close to the proposed wind farms who have accused the royal family of hypocrisy. A number of campaign groups have also openly voiced their opposition to the wind farm proposals.

“This is very hypocritical,” the Daily Mail quoted Michael King, chairman of Billingborough parish council as saying. “There’s real resentment here and people have written letters to Prince Charles. He doesn’t have it on his doorstep. What’s worse is that we feel the Royal estate have really been the agents provocateurs in this, asking the energy companies to come on board, not the other way around.”

Earlier, in Nov 2011, Prince Philip had strongly opposed the construction of such wind farms branding them as “absolutely useless”.

The Duke of Edinburgh had also criticised the industry’s reliance on subsidies from electricity customers, claimed wind farms would “never work” and accused people who support them of believing in a “fairy tale”.

Prince Charles, on the other hand, has reportedly described wind farms as a “horrendous blot on the landscape”.

A major argument regarding the wind farms is that as the turbines do not generate electricity in the absence of winds, there is a need for other ways to generate power.

The proponents however argue that it is possible to build “pump storage” schemes, which would use excess energy from wind power to pump water into reservoirs to generate further electricity in times of high demand and low supply.

Source:  By Monami Thakur, International Business Times, www.ibtimes.co.uk 21 April 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky