[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Settlement clears lawsuit against first Nevada wind project 

Credit:  Benjamin Romano, Recharge, www.rechargenews.com 18 April 2012 ~~

Wind developer Pattern Energy has settled a lawsuit with environmental groups that sought to stop its 150MW Spring Valley Wind project, slated to be the first in Nevada.

The Center for Biological Diversity and Western Watersheds Project sued the Bureau of Land Management in 2011, alleging that the project received inadequate environmental scrutiny.

The environmentalists were particularly concerned with the proximity of the project to a cave housing migratory and resident bat populations, including Mexican free-tail bats.

Pattern, however, is a leader in using radar to detect birds and bats around wind projects and is deploying systems at Spring Valley that can detect the bats as they enter and exit the cave.

The lawsuit failed to stop the project, which is under construction and due to come online in July.

The settlement agreement describes bird and bat mortality surveys to occur in the years following commercial operation of the project, funds for additional study of the use of the cave by the bats, and additional mitigation measures that will be taken if mortality is higher than expected.

Mike Garland, Pattern chief executive, says the settlement underscores his company’s commitment to “minimizing environmental and cultural impacts” of its wind projects, and should give the plaintiffs “more confidence” that Spring Valley is well designed.

“We are starting to see that all renewable energy projects, no matter how well-planned, are being questioned,” Garland says.

Source:  Benjamin Romano, Recharge, www.rechargenews.com 18 April 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky