[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Lowell wind project: PSB OKs noise monitoring plan 

Credit:  Robin Smith, Staff Writer, The Orleans Record, orleanscountyrecord.com 7 April 2012 ~~

While the Derby area is only beginning to battle over wind turbines, those affected by the Lowell wind project are approaching the end of their regulatory process.

One of the outstanding issues – how to measure the sound impact after the 21 Lowell turbines are operating – has now been resolved.

State utility regulators this week issued an order outlining the noise monitoring procedures at homes and roads near the Lowell wind project.

The Vermont Public Service Board said in the order that this plan helps Green Mountain Power meet one more condition needed before the turbines can operate.

The PSB issued a certificate of public good for the Lowell wind project to GMP last May. The sites on the ridgeline are partly constructed, with the crane path mostly complete. GMP has said that construction would resume sometime in the spring and the project is on track to be operating before the end of the year.

But some conditions are still being met.

In the noise monitoring order, the PSB approved of GMP’s amended plan with some changes to address concerns raised by the towns of Albany and Craftsbury and the Lowell Mountain Group.

The board noted that the noise-monitoring plan is different than what was required for the Sheffield wind project – pointing out that the parties identified some problems with the original plan.

Board members James Volz, David Coen and John Burke agreed with the Department of Public Service in saying that the monitoring will involve a neutral third party observer to oversee the first two-week monitoring period to assess compliance with the certificate of public good.

Ideally, the board said the third party will be someone agreed to by GMP, the Department of Public Service and the towns and the Lowell Mountain Group.

If they can’t agree, then the board would make the choice.

“The third party’s role shall include review of the placement of microphones at the monitored locations, as well as review of the data collected,” stated the PSB members.

The third party shall file a report with the board about whether the turbines’ sound levels were accurately captured, whether the data was sufficient, and recommendations if any for altering the plan to ensure the maximum sound levels for the wind project are being captured, the board stated.

The board could extend the third-party review of additional monitoring based on the report. GMP will pay for the third-party observer.

Also, the board ordered GMP to find a place on Eden Road to measure maximum sound levels and near the Christiansen residence. GMP must “make every reasonable effort to site microphones in a manner that will maximize the probability of capturing the maximum noise levels at each monitoring location,” the PSB stated.

GMP must react within four weeks to a noise-related complaint, not the three months GMP requested, the board said.

The board detailed how the testing must be done if measurements are near the level of a violation.

“GMP shall make all reasonable efforts to conduct such monitoring under conditions similar to those existing at the time the complaint arose,” the board stated.

And GMP must do testing during times when the temperature falls below 14 degrees, with the board acknowledging that some tests may not be accurate at those temperatures. GMP is allowed to explain why the data would be faulty.

The board did not require extended monitoring times and more nighttime monitoring as requested by the towns and the Lowell Mountain Group, saying that residents have method for filing complaints and getting additional testing if problems occur.

Source:  Robin Smith, Staff Writer, The Orleans Record, orleanscountyrecord.com 7 April 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky