[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Cardeston turbine plan rejected after meeting chaos  

Credit:  By Wayne Beese, Shropshire Star, www.shropshirestar.com 6 April 2012 ~~

Controversial plans to install a 150ft wind turbine in the Shropshire countryside have been thrown out amid chaotic scenes at a council meeting to decide on the scheme.

The application for the wind turbine at Lower House Farm in Cardeston, near Shrewsbury, was refused at a central planning committee meeting yesterday. But the decision was shrouded in controversy.

It came after confusion following a tie in the voting – with five members voting to approve the turbine and five against.

Councillor Tudor Bebb, chairman of the Shirehall meeting, thought he had abstained from the voting and was unsure about whether he was able to cast the deciding vote in the event of the tie.

A debate ensued about whether to take the vote again but after a short break so that legal advice could be given, the plans were turned down.

Councillor Bebb said: “The situation is that because I didn’t technically vote to abstain the first time around I still have the casting say on this matter and my vote is for refusal.”

Members had raised fears about the huge impact it would have on the village and residents claimed it would destroy their countryside for generations.

Resident Roger Carlisle said: “It has been said recently that wind power is the most inefficient form of solar power and in fact council leader Keith Barrow has said that people are only interested in it because of the huge subsidies involved and he is completely right.

“It would be total hypocrisy if this goes ahead and the character of Shropshire would be ruined for generations.”

But agents on behalf of applicants Gethin and Co argued that despite some objections the development had also received some support from locals.

Source:  By Wayne Beese, Shropshire Star, www.shropshirestar.com 6 April 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.