[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

when your community is targeted


RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Is wind dead in the Thousand Islands? 

Credit:  Jefferson's Leaning Left, jeffersonleaningleft.blogspot.com 8 March 2012 ~~

Tonight, in a nearly filled Jefferson County Community College auditorium, anti-wind and pro-wind citizens heard NY 118 District Assembly Member Addie Russell tell them that Article X legislation will never allow wind turbines to be built in our area. (New York’s Golden Crescent on Lake Ontario and the Thousand Island’s Region of the St. Lawrence River.)

During the JCC symposium, Assemblyman Kevin Cahill explained the pros and procedures of Article X legislation.

Then, Assembly person Addie Russell explained the many reasons why she voted against the Power NY-Article X legislation.

She said it was not that she was anti-wind. There was a place for it in our State’s energy portfolio. But, it can be overly utilized.

Addie expressed deep concern for the loss of the home values of people living near turbines and she was also concerned about the threat of eminent domain, including the loss of the rights of the industrial wind leaseholders because of what they give up to the wind developers when they sign leases.

“Article X will never allow them to be built here”, said Russell. “I believe industrial wind is done for the entire region. With Article X, we have just lost the ability to have the projects that have been proposed here. Article X has relieved us of the burden of industrial wind.”

Industrial wind projects are proposed for Cape Vincent, Clayton, Lyme and Hammond, NY.

Russell then said that on a local level, our communities can now be free to look at other ways to control our energy needs with personal wind towers and solar.

Kevin Cahill agreed with Russell by saying that the view shed of our area is a legitimate reason for local municipalities to object to Article X sitings of industrial wind.

Cahill also emphasized that Article will bring some towns back into the decision making because “some towns were corrupted”. His statement was followed by a long round of applause by the mostly anti-wind attendees. During the question and answer period on person commented that their town had thrown out the industrial wind conflicted public servants.

I went to the microphone and thanked Assembly member Addie Russell for her defense of local rule and her opposition vote on Article X. I then asked Assemblyman Kevin Cahill if the locally appointed members of the Article X siting boards were voting members. He said yes.

During the question and answer period, Voter for Wind member, Paul Mason of Cape Vincent told Russell that Cape Vincent had lost home rule because of last November’s absentee votes by the seasonal voters. Russell replied that because of that issue, more people now have the right to vote on the wind decision. She also told Mr. Mason to be careful what he wished for because Article X means that the uniqueness of our area and its view shed will probably prohibit wind turbines.

When Russell and Cahill were told that Cape Vincent had very good wind, Cahill replied not to worry because all of the other places they will be put in New York State will have good wind, too.

Lyme Town Council member Boo Harris asked Cahill and Russell if placing an outright ban on turbines in a community would be considered an undue burden by Article X siting boards. Addie Russell replied that a ban would probably not pass the test of the courts and a town would be better off with a well written zoning ordinance.

Russell explained that in New York State there is no need for all of the wind projects proposed, especially where there is no existing delivery system. And, in conclusion, she said, “probably this is it for wind development here because of our unique area”.

She then added that She and Kevin Cahill are proponents of solar power.

Source:  Jefferson's Leaning Left, jeffersonleaningleft.blogspot.com 8 March 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky