[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Ohio Supreme Court approves Champaign County wind energy operation  

In a dissent, Justice Evelyn Lundberg Stratton wrote that the board should have conducted a follow-up hearing to address unresolved safety and environmental issues. Stratton said the board failed to publicly resolve concerns that a distance of 541 feet between wind turbines and neighboring property was enough to protect neighbors if a 170-foot-long turbine blade broke loose and went flying through the air. Buckeye Wind’s “formula” for calculating a safe setback distance wasn’t shared with the public, Stratton wrote.

Credit:  Staff Report, Dayton Daily News, www.daytondailynews.com 6 March 2012 ~~

COLUMBUS – The Ohio Supreme Court on Tuesday cleared the way for construction and operation of a wind energy facility in Champaign County, despite a dissenting justice’s conclusion that a public safety concern wasn’t adequately addressed.

The court, in a 4-3 decision, upheld an order by Ohio’s Power Siting Board approving the application of Buckeye Wind LLC to build and operate the “wind farm.”

The facility is to include 70 wind-driven rotary turbines on 9,000 acres leased from the property owners. It was subject to approval by the Power Siting Board because, with the capacity to generate 126 megawatts of electric power, the operation qualified as a “major utility facility.”

After hearing concerns raised by neighbors and local communities, the board in March 2010 approved the facility plan with 70 modifications to be included in the certificate authorizing construction. Champaign County and neighboring property owners appealed to the Ohio Supreme Court, contending that there were errors in the approval process and not all safety concerns were addressed.

Justice Judith Ann Lanzinger wrote the court’s majority opinion upholding the Power Siting Board’s order.

In a dissent, Justice Evelyn Lundberg Stratton wrote that the board should have conducted a follow-up hearing to address unresolved safety and environmental issues. Stratton said the board failed to publicly resolve concerns that a distance of 541 feet between wind turbines and neighboring property was enough to protect neighbors if a 170-foot-long turbine blade broke loose and went flying through the air. Buckeye Wind’s “formula” for calculating a safe setback distance wasn’t shared with the public, Stratton wrote.

Source:  Staff Report, Dayton Daily News, www.daytondailynews.com 6 March 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter