[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Prattsburgh wind law a good start, but it needs improvement  

Credit:  www.steubencourier.com 3 March 2012 ~~

“Trying to sleep at this level of sound and vibration [over 45 dBa] is like trying to sleep in a wind tunnel. When winds are from the South/ Southwest, I go for several days with no sleep. . . The turbines are 1,500 feet from my home.” Cohocton Resident
Wind turbines need to be regulated carefully. They are 400 foot machines with multi-ton moving parts. Putting them too close to a property line means a neighbor can’t safely use his own property
Dehumanizing people by calling them names is a time honored way to remove people’s rights without arousing sympathy from observers. So people who mention noise and shadow flicker aren’t homeowners who love Prattsburgh: they are “antis.” Residents who talk about setbacks for health and safety aren’t your neighbors: they are “liars.” And it’s not just commercial wind that brings on the name calling in Prattsburgh.
Because of sarcasm and name calling, too many intelligent people with integrity steer clear of town business. They don’t want to be called names, and have their families’ characters assassinated when they stand up for what they believe in. Intimidation works.
A wind law has been passed in Prattsburgh. It’s not a great law. The setbacks are a tremendous compromise. Judging from the noise and shadow flicker in other towns in the United States, Europe and Australia, the setbacks should be much greater, but it is better than nothing.
No one is opposed to renewable energy. It’s not a matter of for or against – it is a matter of designing a project that does the least harm to people in the project area.

Ruth Matilsky
Prattsburgh, NY

Source:  www.steubencourier.com 3 March 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.



Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

National Wind Watch