[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

when your community is targeted


RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Turbine opponents file Open Meeting Law complaint 

Credit:  By DON CUDDY, www.southcoasttoday.com 17 February 2012 ~~

FAIRHAVEN – Opponents of the Fairhaven wind turbines have filed a complaint with the state Attorney General’s Office, charging Fairhaven selectmen with violating the state’s Open Meeting Law in their discussions about the controversial project.

Selectmen Chairman Michael Silvia rejected the allegations, saying the complaint has no merit.

The complainants allege that police officers prevented some people from entering a meeting because the room was full but say they have video showing empty seats.

“I feel we have answered all of the accusations. The police chief interviewed the four officers and they all said it never happened,” Silvia said.

In addition, on the date referenced in the complaint, selectmen did not meet, according to Silvia. “I think they are confusing it with another board,” he said.

The town also disputed claims that the times and agendas for board meetings were not made public.

The complaint process has been very confusing to everyone, according to Ken Pottel, a leading member of Windwise, the group that opposes the turbines.

“It’s certainly not what I’d call streamlined,” he said.

The Attorney General’s Office recently contacted the group, allowing it more time to respond to the town’s rebuttal to its filing.

“What happened was we filed our complaint and the selectmen responded to the attorney general,” Pottel said. “But the Attorney Ggeneral’s office never sent us a copy of the town’s response like they should have. So now they are extending the deadline to allow us to respond.”

The original deadline was March 12 but Pottel said that would now be extended, since the mistake lay with the Attorney General’s Office. “They are going to let us know the new date,” he said Thursday evening.

Source:  By DON CUDDY, www.southcoasttoday.com 17 February 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky