[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Maryland Senate concerned with wind farm costs  

Credit:  By ELLEN STODOLA Capital News Service, www.stardem.com 16 February 2012 ~~

Despite reassurances from Gov. Martin O’Malley that additional consumer fees would be capped at $2 a month under his wind farm proposal, a number of senators said Tuesday they are still concerned tapping into offshore wind would cost too much.

O’Malley told members of the Senate Finance Committee Tuesday wind energy is essential for Maryland’s future, and ratepayers wouldn’t even see any increases in their utility bills for years to come.

The long-term liabilities for utility companies and the potential fee increases for ratepayers were two key reasons similar wind farm legislation was unsuccessful last year.

This year’s legislation offers adjustments that would cap the potential increase on Maryland residents’ utility bills at $2 a month. It also gives companies buying offshore wind power the opportunity to earn renewable energy credits.

“Ratepayers would not be charged for wind energy generation until the turbines start spinning,” O’Malley said, in response to concern from Sen. E.J. Pipkin, R-Cecil.

Pipkin has been a vocal opponent of offshore wind because he believes the money spent to bring the industry to Maryland would be better spent elsewhere. He also disputes the governor’s cost estimates.

“The $2-a-month cap, it’s nowhere near the cost of what the offshore wind is going to cost,” Pipkin said.

Sen. Allan Kittleman, R-Howard, said he also has concerns about whether the $2-a-month cap is realistic.

“My concern is the fact that when you piggyback all the costs together, it does get to be more than $2 a month,” Kittleman said.

O’Malley said it would probably be another five to six years before ratepayers even see a change in their utility bills.

He said the goal of reaching 20 percent of energy generated being from renewable sources by 2022, under the Maryland Renewable Energy Portfolio Standard, is a big factor in the desire to explore offshore wind.

Maryland needs to take steps to move forward because wind is one of Maryland’s most abundant sources of energy, he said.

O’Malley said offshore wind development is obviously a long-term project that won’t happen overnight. Many things still need to happen for it to work out, but he said if people believe climate change is real and the price of fossil fuels is going to go up in the next 30 years, then wind is a good bet.

Though O’Malley said there were still things to be worked out, he said wind power is a way for Maryland to “realize a cleaner, greener energy future.”

“I don’t have a crystal ball that can see how all of this comes together,” O’Malley said. “I know we are not going to hit our renewable portfolio standard, which this General Assembly supported and voted for, unless we take advantage of the most abundant natural resource with the technology available to us today on offshore wind.”

Source:  By ELLEN STODOLA Capital News Service, www.stardem.com 16 February 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter