[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Where are the environmentalists? 

Credit:  www.htrnews.com 14 February 2012 ~~

In courses I taught in environmental studies in my 31 years as a public educator, I introduced my students to the writings of the late Aldo Leopold, a Wisconsin environmental scientist, hailed as “the father of modern ecology.” Leopold’s philosophy promoted the need for America to develop a culture that emphasized land stewardship.

To use his own words: “That land is a community, is the basic concept of ecology, but that land is to be loved and respected is an extension of ethics.”

Wisconsin’s push for industrial wind turbine systems is the antithesis of what Leopold believed. He would be aghast at the thousands of acres of rural Wisconsin ecosystems disrupted by the audible noise and shadow flicker turbines generate.

Growing evidence from Wisconsin wind facilities indicates significant human health problems related to low frequency noise, infrasound, and electrical pollution, and unresolved issues of high bird and bat mortality. Numerous studies are available at www.betterplan.squarespace.com.

Contact your legislators in Madison before March 15 to share your concerns. Environmental organizations have turned a deaf ear or stand with the wind corporations in discrediting wind facility residents as kooks or NIMBYs.

I have communicated these problems to CEOs of National Audubon Society, Nature Conservancy and the National Wildlife Federation, with no response. Why are they all silent? Why are environmentalists failing to do their homework? Is it feared that epidemiological and environmental impact studies will yield inconvenient truths about the downside of wind as the solution to energy and climate change dilemmas?

Carl Johnson


Source:  www.htrnews.com 14 February 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky