[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Eye airfield wind turbine plans approved  

Credit:  Dominic Bareham, senior reporter, Norwich Evening News, www.eveningnews24.co.uk 14 February 2012 ~~

A wind energy firm chief has spoken of his delight after plans to erect two new 130m- high wind turbines near a Suffolk town were approved.

Andy Hilton, managing director of Stalham-based Wind Power Renewables, said the masts on farmland owned by Roy Humphrey on the edge of Eye airfield industrial estate, near the A140, would provide a financial boost for Eye as the company has pledged to give £175,000 of the revenue generated by the turbine over the next 25 years to the town council.

The plans were approved by Mid Suffolk District Council on Friday.

He said: “We are absolutely over the moon about the decision. It will also provide quite a substantial amount of money for the town council, which should be able to do quite a bit of good with the money.”

Further revenue from the sale of electricity generated by the masts will be used to rejuvenate local hedgerows, some of which have gaps, as well as other conservation measures.

However, the plans received a mixed response during a council consultation process prior to the approval.

Out of 24 responses from the public, Mid Suffolk District Council received 12 objection letters during the one-month process, which ended on December 23.

The objectors raised concerns about the visual impact of the turbines on the surrounding countryside, shadow flicker in sunlight and noise.

Supporters cited the clean way turbines produce renewable energy and the prospect of the turbines producing 5 million kW/h of pollution-free electricity each year.

Mr Hilton claimed the scheme would generate enough renewable energy to power more than 6,000 homes. His firm had originally applied for three turbines, but downgraded the application to two.

Source:  Dominic Bareham, senior reporter, Norwich Evening News, www.eveningnews24.co.uk 14 February 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

National Wind Watch