[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind company appeals proposed power line route  

Credit:  By SAMANTHA TIPLER, East Oregonian, www.eastoregonian.com 11 February 2012 ~~

The Umatilla County commissioners are scheduled Monday to hear an appeal of a permit denied for a power line connecting a proposed wind farm near Athena to a regional grid.

WKN Chopin, a subsidiary of WKN USA, also known as Windkraft Nord, asserts the planning commission failed to follow the county comprehensive plan when it denied the permit in November, according to papers the company filed Dec. 6.

WKN has permission to build a 99-megawatt, 33-turbine wind farm between Milton-Freewater and Athena. The planning commission approved the WKN wind-farm permit Oct. 10.

Blue Mountain Alliance, a conservation group proposing stricter guidelines on wind-turbine sites in Umatilla County, appealed that decision. The three-member board of commissioners upheld the planning commission approval Nov. 30.

Nov. 17 the planning commission denied WKN a permit to build a 230-kilovolt power line to link that wind farm to the regional grid. The power line route runs along rights-of-way south and east from the wind farm to a PacifiCorp line in the Blue Mountains.

The WKN appeal cites five ways the planning commission didn’t comply with the county comprehensive plan. The planning commission was wrong, according to WKN, to require a technical and engineering feasibility study.

WKN also argues it need not choose the most direct route between its wind farm and the power grid, as the planning commission wanted. WKN said it chose its route to avoid interfereing with the viewshed on Highway 204, the Tollgate Highway.

WKN also disagreed with the planning commission on the company use of farm and/or urban land in the proposed power line route.

Source:  By SAMANTHA TIPLER, East Oregonian, www.eastoregonian.com 11 February 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.