[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Sumner making progress on wind ordinance  

Credit:  By Terry Karkos, Staff Writer, Sun Journal, www.sunjournal.com 12 February 2012 ~~

SUMNER – A committee working to create an ordinance to regulate wind development agreed Saturday that only one application at a time should come before the town’s Planning Board.

Members of the Wind Ordinance Committee liked member Larry O’Rourke’s suggestion to allow such applications on a first-come, first-served basis.

“I can’t imagine getting three or four of these at the same time,” he said.

“God help us if that happens,” Chairwoman Kathy Emery said.

They also debated making a developer go through the Planning Board process to erect a meteorological tower.

Later, Emery explained why they were spending so much time on the safety the section.

“I honestly think that what we are trying to accomplish and finish right now, this is going to be the most difficult,” she said. “I am very happy with what (Rumford’s wind ordinance) included, as far as the safety.”

Emery said she was confident that members of subcommittees working on other sections of the ordinance would craft condensed and working language to protect townspeople.

“Yes, we are behind; yes, we’ve got a lot of catchup to do,” Emery said. “Yes, this is a complicated, huge chunk of it, but it’s imperative that this is done right.”

The committee was trying to retrofit and meld portions of Sumner’s Subdivision Ordinance and Rumford’s wind ordinance into the town’s proposed Industrial Wind Energy Facility Ordinance.

That ordinance is expected to be completed in time for a public hearing seven days prior to April 18. That’s when a special town meeting will be held to vote on the new law, Emery said.

With facilitator James McCarthy moderating, the group began with a round-the-table sharing of thoughts.

Committee member John Allen said he agreed with member Lana Pratt that language in the latest wind ordinance draft was confusing.

“I read the whole thing through and made quite a few changes and Lana thinks we could make even more,” Allen said. “We haven’t finalized this yet.”

Member Jeff Pfeiffer said he, too, was confused by the language. He suggested creating a time line of what happens during the application process “before we plunge into the text.”

It would be good to have a quick overview, Pfeiffer said, “because I found myself having to do that in small ways just to understand the process.”

Emery said the committee has already approved everything they did up to Thursday night’s meeting. That’s what they’re presenting to selectmen on Tuesday, Feb. 14.

Source:  By Terry Karkos, Staff Writer, Sun Journal, www.sunjournal.com 12 February 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.