[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

when your community is targeted


RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Threat to birds sees Kintyre turbines plan rejected 

Credit:  By Jane Candlish, The Press and Journal, 2 February 2012 ~~

Plans for a windfarm on the Mull of Kintyre have been thrown out by the Scottish Government because the development might harm local populations of hen harriers.

The Kilchattan windfarm would also have a “considerable” visual impact on the landscape, reporter Jill Moody said.

The proposals were for 16 turbines – each reaching a height of 265ft – north of the village of Southend.

The windfarm was being developed as a joint venture between Wind Prospect Developments and Ridgewind.

They submitted a planning application to Argyll and Bute Council in January 2008. The council refused the plans and an inquiry was held in 2010.

In her determination, published yesterday, Ms Moody said that there would be significant loss of visual and residential amenity for the village of Southend. She added: “I am satisfied that in this case, the balance in favour does not outweigh the potential for this extremely sensitive location to suffer unacceptably severe negative effects if the proposed windfarm were to proceed.”

A spokeswoman for the windfarm company said: “Our Edinburgh team has worked hard for a number of years on the Kilchattan windfarm proposal, so we are understandably disappointed at the outcome of the appeal. As responsible developers we pride ourselves on very careful site selection and will only proceed to develop those sites which we believe to be acceptable in relation to current planning policy.

“Throughout the planning process we, along with our expert consultants, considered the site to be suitable for this scale of development. However, unfortunately we have been unsuccessful in obtaining planning consent for this particular proposal and whilst we will consider the points made by the Scottish Government Reporter, we are unlikely to pursue further interest in the site.”

Source:  By Jane Candlish, The Press and Journal, 2 February 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)


e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon