[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Riverhead sewer plant wind turbine proposal collapses  

Credit:  By Tim Gannon, Riverhead News-Review, riverheadnewsreview.timesreview.com 12 January 2012 ~~

Forget about that wind turbine that was planned for Riverhead Town’s sewer district property on Riverside Drive.

Three of the five Town Board members say they no longer support the project after hearing an updated cost estimate on the job, which indicates that it won’t begin to turn a project until it’s 18th year in operation.

Sewer district superintendent Michael Reichel had advocated building a 750 kw wind turbine that would cost the town, at most, $1.8 million to build. But the energy generated by the 270-foot high turbine was expected to provide power for the sewer plant.

Originally, it was believed that the turbine would pay off the $1.8 millon cost within 11 years and that it would then generate $5 million in energy savings over its projected 25-year life. That was according to consultant Peter Rusy of DHL Power, which did a feasibility study on the proposal.

However, a study done by the New York Power Authority found that the plant wouldn’t pay for itself until much later than that, and that the cost might exceed $2 million.

“This makes no sense to do this project,” Supervisor Sean Walter said.

Mr. Walter and councilmen George Gabrielsen and John Dunleavy oppose moving forward with the turbine project, although Mr. Dunleavy said his opposition was due to the height of the proposed wind turbine.

Councilmembers Jim Wooten and Jodi Giglio said they didn’t want to give up on it because there is a $470,000 in grant money available for the project that the town will lose at the end of February if they don’t move forward with the project.

Source:  By Tim Gannon, Riverhead News-Review, riverheadnewsreview.timesreview.com 12 January 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.