[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Moon Island turbine proposal inches along in Quincy  

Credit:  By Jack Encarnacao, The Patriot Ledger, www.wickedlocal.com 12 January 2012 ~~

QUINCY – It’s shaping up to be a process that will move more slowly than a turbine blade on a windless day.

Nearly two years after Boston proposed building a 400-foot wind turbine on Moon Island, the first independent study of the plan was presented to Quincy’s planning board Wednesday.

After a brief presentation to the board on the review, Ward 6 City Councilor Brian McNamee said the discourse around the proposal “gingerly dances around some of the concern that I think the residents Squantum are going to have.”

“There was no mention of what we’re going to get from the City of Boston,” McNamee said. “It appears that the proposal at this point is good for Boston and bad for Quincy. We’ve essentially been a doormat for Boston in their utilization of Moon Island.”

Vehicles can only access Moon Island, which is in Quincy but owned by Boston, via local roads in Squantum. The traffic to the island, which has a Boston police shooting range, has long been a source of tension between the cities.

Both cities plan to split whatever revenue the turbine brings in by selling the power it creates.

The planning board members had the review, by the Plymouth firm Beals + Thomas, summarized to them at their meeting Wednesday, and voted to continue the discussion at their Feb. 8 meeting.

The review pointed out several potential issues with Boston’s proposal, including a lack of information about how much grading would be needed for an access road and tower foundation area. It also said a setback waiver on the southeast side is needed and and that an emergency services and traffic plan is lacking.

“I’d like to get any questions resolved,” Nicholas Verenis, Quincy’s economic planner, told the planning board.

Todd Isherwood, Boston’s project manager for energy efficiency and alternative energy, declined to comment after Wednesday’s meeting.

Planning board members Wednesday said they were concerned about noise and the accuracy of photo simulations of shadows the turbine would cast.

Sound levels would comply with Quincy and state Department of Environmental Protection standards, according to Boston’s proposal.

McNamee said the proposal is likely to only get real traction when thorny mitigation issues are broached.

These, he said, would include the percentage Quincy would get in a revenue split and possible closing of the gun range, whose hours were reduced in October by Boston Mayor Thomas Menino.

“Everybody wants clean energy, but what are the costs?” McNamee said. “There are real environmental and aesthetic costs here. To put a structure the size of the (Boston) Custom House on top of Moon Island, a beautiful Harbor Island, it’s asking for quite a bit.”

The Moon Island proposal is among a slew of wind turbines either proposed or being built on the South Shore.

Five turbines have gone up in Kingston in the past four months, and pieces of a new turbine that will be built on the Driftway in Scituate are scheduled to arrive next week. Turbines are also being discussed in Weymouth, Norwell and Milton.

Source:  By Jack Encarnacao, The Patriot Ledger, www.wickedlocal.com 12 January 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.