Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
Missing important point on wind power
Credit: newsok.com 7 January 2012 ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
The letters by Noel Patten and Andre Snodgrass (Your Views, Dec. 26) concerning “Carmen embraces power of wind to save energy” (Business, Dec. 16) missed an important point: Carmen wanted to save money. They may be saving their money, but the federal grant of almost a quarter of a million dollars is taxpayer money. It’s not being saved. If the windmills produced maximum power for 24 hours a day for nine years, the investment might break even. The city fathers would be in trouble if they invested local tax money that way. In that time the equipment could break down, become obsolete or cost more to operate than it’s worth.
Also, no wind, no power. Too much wind, no power. Carmen wants to be the greenest little town. Well, that will be our greenbacks blowing in the wind. The U.S. Department of Energy also “invested” in a company called Solyndra.
Robert Chatham, Oklahoma City
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
Wind Watch relies entirely on User Contributions |
(via Stripe) |
(via Paypal) |
Share: