[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Academic’s response was disappointing  

Credit:  The Courier, www.thecourier.com.au 4 January 2012 ~~

I am disappointed that such a self-proclaimed fighter for the health rights of others as Prof Simon Chapman has joined the ranks of those who deny that wind turbines have any impact on those who reside in close proximity.

To further denigrate these victims as only suffering due to envy, is a very poor response from this academic of such high standing.

Whether there were 30 or 2000 at the wind industry conference is not the issue, but rather that public health research has got it wrong before and while no offence was ever intended to the victims of tobacco or asbestos, original research cleared both products of any adverse public health outcomes, and these industries denied any health problems attributable to their products.

How wrong they were. The wind energy industry and its supporters like Simon Chapman, maybe should take a risk adverse approach and view all the available evidence and stop their denials.

I would welcome Prof Chapman to visit us, and meet people in our communities who suffer sleep deprivation and other more severe effects of living close to wind turbines.

And by the way, if Prof Chapman had attended the wind industry conference, he would have heard me say that I have no problem with the aesthetics of wind turbines, and that our Council supports renewable energy. However, it is our job to stand up for our communities and make sure that they are not being bullied and hurt by any industrial development whether it be wind farms, coal mining or other noxious industry.


Mayor, Moorabool Shire Council

Source:  The Courier, www.thecourier.com.au 4 January 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.