[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Can renewable energy targets justify the spoiling of historic landscapes?  

Credit:  The Telegraph, www.telegraph.co.uk 31 December 2011 ~~

SIR – You call (Leading article, December 21) for Greg Clark, the minister responsible for redrafting the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF), to “produce another draft that is more precise and better defined”. One important area that requires urgent clarity is the positioning of wind farms close to heritage sites.

Despite Government assurances that “heritage protection” is not being watered down, two disturbing appeal decisions in Northamptonshire have been upheld by Government-appointed inspectors. These show that the blind goal of “renewable energy targets” is nullifying the very idea of localism. They also undermine David Cameron’s claim that heritage must be safeguarded in the planning process.

At Kelmarsh, six giant turbines will disfigure the historic Civil War battlefield of Naseby and greatly harm the setting of Kelmarsh Hall, described by Nikolaus Pevsner as “perfect”. Even the inspector admits the house is of the “highest” significance and that the turbines will be “an obvious presence”, as well as harming the adjoining field where English Heritage stages its annual Festival of History.

At Watford Lodge, too, turbines will spoil the setting of Ashby St Ledgers manor house, where the Gunpowder Plot was schemed. They will be visible from the celebrated gardens made by Gertrude Jekyll.

Heritage is a reason why so many people visit Britain every year. Heritage tourism contributes £12 billion to the economy.

With Chris Huhne promising up to 32,000 wind turbines, clarity on where they can be sited is urgent. If the Planning Inspectorate uses renewable energy targets as a reason for agreeing schemes, regardless of impact, is there any point in a local democratic planning process?

Cllr Chris Millar
Leader, Daventry District Council

Chris Heaton-Harris MP (Con)
Daventry, Northamptonshire

Source:  The Telegraph, www.telegraph.co.uk 31 December 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter