News Home

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

SJC affirms Cape Wind power-purchase deal  

Credit:  By Patrick Cassidy, Cape Cod Times, www.capecodonline.com 28 December 2011 ~~

The state’s highest court has backed Massachusetts utility regulators’ approval of a deal between Cape Wind and National Grid for power from the proposed Nantucket Sound wind farm.

In a decision released today, the state Supreme Judicial Court found that a power-purchase agreement for half of the 130-turbine project’s energy was not unconstitutional, as opponents of the deal argued. In a separate decision, the court denied a motion by opponents to reopen the state Department of Public Utilities record on the agreement.

In the court’s 34-page decision on whether the deal between Cape Wind and National Grid is constitutional or has other issues such as cost effectiveness, Justice Margot Botsford wrote that there was no violation of the federal commerce clause because the state lifted its limitation that only allowed it to review power sources within the state.

“Based on the record, the department ultimately found that National Grid demonstrated that it had complied with the new, nongeographically limited statute and regulations in its negotiations with Cape Wind,” Botsford wrote.

National Grid agreed to the deal with Cape Wind based on reasons unrelated to the geographic limitation, Botsford wrote.

Cape Wind’s primary opponents, the Alliance to Protect Nantucket Sound, and the other plaintiffs in the cases before the Supreme Judicial Court, argued that the DPU improperly found the agreement to be cost effective and that the contract should have been solicited through competitive bidding.

On the question of cost effectiveness, Botsford wrote that under the state’s Green Communities Act cost effectiveness does not simply mean least cost.

“Rather, an analysis of cost effectiveness must consider ‘all costs and benefits associated with (the power purchase agreement), including the non-price benefits that are difficult to quantify, and including costs and benefits of complying with existing and reasonably anticipated future federal and state environmental requirements,’” Botsford wrote.

In its second opinion released today the court found that the DPU did not abuse its discretion in denying a motion by the Alliance to reopen the record of the department’s review of the agreement between Cape Wind and National Grid so it would include information about contracts between NStar and other renewable energy developers.

Although the Alliance and the town of Barnstable recently won an important case before the U.S. Court of Appeals challenging the Federal Aviation Administration’s approval of Cape Wind, the developer has won more than a dozen other lawsuits connected to the project. Several federal lawsuits challenging the U.S. Department of Interior’s approval of the project are pending in federal court.

In 2010 the state Supreme Judicial Court ruled in favor of a comprehensive permit issued by the state for the project that was challenged by opponents.

The FAA is currently reviewing the project’s potential hazard to navigation in light of the federal appeals court decision faulting its approval of the project, according to an FAA spokeswoman.

Cape Wind must still secure a buyer for the second half of its power and financial support to construct the wind farm.

Source:  By Patrick Cassidy, Cape Cod Times, www.capecodonline.com 28 December 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.