[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Richfield residents file lawsuit to halt wind project  

Credit:  By BRYON ACKERMAN, Observer-Dispatch, www.uticaod.com 20 December 2011 ~~

RICHFIELD – Residents have filed an Article 78 lawsuit against the Richfield Planning Board in an attempt to block the wind project proposed there.

The lawsuit, which was filed yesterday in state Supreme Court, seeks to overturn the Planning Board’s declaration that the project would not have any significant environmental impacts.

Richfield resident Larry Frigault, who is one of the petitioners and the spokesman for the Protect Richfield group, said there is no way the project would have anything but major impacts in the town.

“We really think this was an attempt to railroad this through before anybody knew about it,” Frigault said.

Filed by 34 residents in the area, the lawsuit claims the Planning Board violated the Open Meetings Law, Agriculture and Markets Law, General Municipal Law, the State Environmental Quality Review Act and other laws. It also names the wind developer and landowners who have entered into agreements with the company.

The proposed Monticello Hills Wind project would feature six 492-feet-tall turbines along Route 20 in Richfield. Ridgeline Energy, which is based in Seattle and is part of France-based Veolia Environnement, is the developer for the project.

Patrick Doyle, Ridgeline Energy’s vice president of development, said he hasn’t seen the lawsuit yet, but he will look at it and take things from there.

“We believe the Planning Board went through a thorough review,” he said.

Richfield Planning Board Chairman Donald Urtz said he isn’t surprised the lawsuit was filed, but the Planning Board conducted its review following advice from the town attorney and an independent adviser.

“To my knowledge, we worked just the way we were supposed to,” Urtz said.

In November, the Planning Board voted 3-2 to make the negative declaration under the State Quality Environmental Review process and 3-2 to issue a special-use permit for the project.

The next step is for a host-community agreement to be negotiated and approved. The Richfield Town Board on Monday tabled their decision on the agreement.

Source:  By BRYON ACKERMAN, Observer-Dispatch, www.uticaod.com 20 December 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter