[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

when your community is targeted


RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Bird advocates urge mandatory standards for wind energy projects 

Credit:  By Louis Sahagun, Los Angeles Times, www.latimes.com 14 December 2011 ~~

The American Bird Conservancy on Wednesday petitioned the U.S. Department of the Interior to replace its proposed voluntary guidelines for siting and operating wind farms with mandatory enforceable standards designed to make the technology safer for wildlife including migrating birds and bats.

The 100-page petition prepared by the conservancy and the Washington-based law firm Meyer, Glitzenstein & Crystal recommends that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service establish a mandatory permitting system for the booming alternative energy source and mitigation of its impacts on bats and migrating birds, thousands of which are killed each year by wind turbines.

Conservancy campaign coordinator Kelly Fuller said the proposal would provide legal certainty that wind developers in compliance with a permit would not be subject to criminal or civil penalties for violation of laws including the Migratory Bird Treaty Act.

“Voluntary guidelines the government has drafted will neither protect birds nor give the wind industry the regulatory certainty it has been asking for,” Fuller said in an interview. “We’re hoping the federal government will take a hard look at our proposal as it completes a final review of its revised proposed guidelines for wind energy projects.”

The development and delivery of renewable energy is one of the highest priorities of the Interior Department. In California, Gov. Jerry Brown in April signed into law a mandate that a third of the electricity used in California come from renewable sources, including wind and solar, by 2020.

The number of proposed turbine towers more than 200 feet tall increased nationwide from 950 in 2003, when the Fish and Wildlife Service first issued voluntary guidelines for wind energy projects, to a total 79,513 by 2010, according to the conservancy.

So far, no wind energy company has been prosecuted by federal wildlife authorities in connection with the death of birds protected by the act, the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act or the federal Endangered Species Act.

Nationwide, about 440,000 birds are killed at wind farms each year, according to federal wildlife authorities. Poorly sited and operated wind farms threaten birds of prey such as bald eagles, golden eagles and endangered California condors, and species of conservation concern including the cerulean warbler, Bicknell’s thrush and long-billed curlew.

“We think this industry almost uniquely lends itself to a permitting process,” said attorney Eric Glitzenstein, who helped prepare the conservancy proposal. “Right now, the federal government is encouraging the growth of the industry in a way that also encourages violations of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act.”

The proposal ruffled the feathers of the American Wind Energy Assn., an industry lobbying group, which pointed out that far more birds are killed each year by collisions with radio towers, tall buildings, airplanes and encounters with hungry household cats.

“We are looking forward to the Fish and Wildlife Service finalizing its wind turbine guidelines,” said John Anderson, the association’s director of siting policy. “These guidelines are based on recommendations from a federal advisory committee, which includes representatives from industry, environmental groups and state wildlife agencies.”

Source:  By Louis Sahagun, Los Angeles Times, www.latimes.com 14 December 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)


e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon