[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Weekly updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Blow for turbine firm as plans ‘face refusal’  

Credit:  Teesdale Mercury, www.teesdalemercury.co.uk 6 December 2011 ~~

A plan to build a £12.5million wind farm in Teesdale is either facing refusal or significant planning delays.
Banks Renewables, which has submitted plans for five 115-metre turbines between village of Woodland and Hamsterley Forest, has been told that its survey work on wildlife is not up to scratch.
It is believed Grant Folley, a council planning officer, has now informed Banks that unless more work is done on the impact on birds and bats, the plan will be recommended for refusal.
Banks face either initiating another year of survey work and then re-submitting the proposal – or having their project turned down.
The news has been welcomed by protest group Hamsterley & Upper Gaunless Action Group (HUGAG), whose members claim the wind farm will destroy the landscape and wildlife.
A spokesman said: “Banks could now withdraw, on grounds that the ecological issues have proved so significant that backing off is the only appropriate response – one that would, at least, serve to enhance their reputation as a ‘development with care’ company.
“Or the firm could decide to press ahead regardless, without commissioning more survey work, in which case they would have to assume that Mr Folley would still recommend refusal. In this instance they would presumably still hope to win at appeal.”
Durham County Council’s advice to Banks that its survey work is not good enough follows a report by Terry Coult, who is an ecologist for the council.
He said the bat and barn survey was “not fit for purpose”, adding that it must be done again next year.
He also raised fears about the impact on birdlife.
“My own understanding of the survey results is that these turbines will have such a significant adverse effect as to make the application untenable,” he said.
At a recent count, there have been more than 240 letters sent to the council against the proposal and one in favour. Eight parish councils have all called for the wind farm plan to be rejected.
In response, Phil Dyke, development director at Banks Renewables, said: “We have worked closely with Natural England, the RSPB and other relevant bodies to ensure that environmental assessment work for the proposed wind farm planning application has been undertaken to agreed standards.
“We will continue to engage with these bodies so that they have the information that they need to enable them to consider the planning application and assessment.”
Mr Dyke said the wind farm would bring jobs for construction firms and a fund that would provide £625,000 of support for local community groups, environmental and voluntary projects during the wind farm’s 25-year lifespan.

Source:  Teesdale Mercury, www.teesdalemercury.co.uk 6 December 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.