[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Amid protests, Richfield board approves wind turbine permit  

Credit:  BY JOE MAHONEY Staff Writer, The Daily Star, thedailystar.com 23 November 2011 ~~

RICHFIELD SPRINGS – A narrowly divided Richfield Town Planning Board agreed Tuesday night to issue a special-use permit to a controversial wind farm project that would erect six 492-foot turbines off U.S. Route 20.

Disappointing about 80 wind farm opponents who crowded into the Trinity Christian Reformed Church, the planners voted, 3-2, to issue the permit. By the same margin, the panel also decided not to require the developers to complete an elaborate environmental impact review. In making the latter decision, the board determined the project would not have significant adverse environmental impacts.

Several local farmers who live near the wind farm said they are considering challenging the dual decisions in court.

Douglas Zamelis of Springfield, a lawyer who has been critical of both the project and the planning board’s review of it, said a lawsuit would be only one of several options.

He declined to elaborate on what other actions could be taken to try to derail the turbines, but did suggest it would be doomed if the Richfield Town Board can be persuaded to refuse to enter into a host community agreement with the development company, Ridgeline Energy of Albany.

“There is no law that I’m aware of that requires the town board to enter into that agreement,” Zamelis said.

Janet Sylvester and Paul Szefliski voted against issuing the permit.

The planners had advertised the place for the meeting at the town office. But when the meeting room there overflowed with turbine foes – some complaining it was filled beyond capacity – the board agreed to hold it at the nearby church. Several residents complained that the meeting should have been postponed instead of being transferred to a house of worship.

At the church, board Chairman Donald Urtz directed state troopers to escort one man out of the building after he refused to stop heckling the members while they were discussing the wind farm.

Following the meeting, Ridgeline Vice President Patrick Doyle said he was pleased that the planners saw the benefits of bringing the $40 million project to Richfield. “The planning board has clearly taken a hard look at this,” he said. “They have been looking at this for nine months.”

He said Ridgeline has to line up a utility company to buy the energy produced by the wind farm. The company’s goal is to turn on the turbines by late 2012.

Ridgeline representatives assured the planners that the company will take “mitigation measures” to reduce the potential for bats to be killed by the turbine blades. The representatives also said they are moving two turbines from their original sites to accommodate a local couple who have indicated they plan to build a house on an adjacent parcel.

Opponents of the project said they fear the wind farm will drive down property values in the area, create health and noise problems and kill many bats which help to keep populations of crop-ravaging insects from exploding.

Source:  BY JOE MAHONEY Staff Writer, The Daily Star, thedailystar.com 23 November 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.