[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind farm effort’s end blamed on agency; Fish and Wildlife says investors didn’t understand process  

Credit:  By Kathie Durbin, Columbian Staff Reporter, The Columbian, www.columbian.com 18 November 2011 ~~

Investors in a proposed wind farm in coastal Pacific County say the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is largely to blame for their decision last week to terminate the $4 million project after four years of planning and studies.

But an agency official says the five public utilities backing the proposed 82-megawatt Radar Ridge project failed to understand the environmental review process the service was required to follow in considering a project that could affect the threatened marbled murrelet, a rare seabird that nests in old-growth forests near the ocean.

Mike Baker, vice president of Energy Northwest, the Tri-Cities-based energy consortium that led the effort to get the wind farm permitted, said in a statement, “A tremendous amount of work has been poured into this project by the participants … to make this a viable, beneficial energy resource for our members.”

“We are disappointed development could not continue, but the permitting framework U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service imposed on us … was untenable,” Baker said. Among other things, he said, the agency proposed an alternative for consideration in the project’s environmental impact statement that would have required shutting down the wind turbines during daylight hours for 6[ ] months of the year, during the murrelet’s nesting season.

That alternative also would have granted the project only a five-year permit, making it difficult to obtain financing, said Doug Miller of Pacific County Public Utility District No. 2, one of four coastal PUDs that invested in Radar Ridge. Miller said the project would have given a boost to the county’s economy with 200 jobs during construction and provided a green energy option for the utility’s customers.

Baker conceded that the service had warned up front that obtaining a federal permit for the project “would not be easy, quick or cheap” because of the presence of nesting murrelets in the area.

“They were right,” he said. “However, we expected the conditions for the permit to be reasonable and based on the science. They were not.”

On the contrary, said Ken Berg, project leader for the Fish and Wildlife Service. He said his agency had worked closely with the investors since 2008, but they failed to understand the challenge of permitting a wind farm in close proximity to a federally listed threatened species.

“I’m disappointed that they decided to cancel the project because we had worked very long and hard with them to make it a success,” Berg said Thursday. “Unfortunately, they picked the most challenging site in Southwest Washington for the first commercial wind energy project.”

Berg said Energy Northwest initially approached the service in the fall of 2008 and said it needed a permit in six months. He suggested the utility find another site.

Berg said Energy Northwest did not understand under the National Environmental Policy Act, the service was required to identify a range of options for a project, send them out for public comment, and then choose one option or a blend of options as the basis for making a formal decision to issue a permit.

“We have not decided what the permit would look like if we issued one,” he said. “What they call permit conditions” – such as identifying when the turbines would be allowed to operate – “are just concepts that we shared with them. We were in the process of developing the environmental impact statement when they stopped funding it” in August.

“They wanted us to guarantee that the final EIS would not include any more conditions,” he said. “Due to the economics of the wind market, they made it clear that unless we rubber-stamped their application, they couldn’t go forward with the project.”

Berg said he had spent more time on the Radar Ridge project than on any other in the past three years.

“It’s important to do wind energy right,” he said. “We knew this was a precedent-setting project for everyone.”

Source:  By Kathie Durbin, Columbian Staff Reporter, The Columbian, www.columbian.com 18 November 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.