LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

News Watch Home

‘Green’ in wind power is money 

Credit:  Times Argus, www.timesargus.com 12 November 2011 ~~

During the Great Depression, the Works Progress Administration proposed building a road along the spine of the Green Mountains in order to create jobs in the state. Vermonters wisely rejected the plan: They understood that desecrating the mountains would entail a deeper cost than any economic benefit the road might bring.

Unfortunately, Gov. Shumlin lacks the same level of wisdom and has been aggressively promoting utility-scale wind development along our ridgelines. The reason, he claims, is that we need to do something about global warming. But these large-scale projects will have a negligible impact on climate change: Because their output varies so widely depending on wind conditions, utilities must compensate by ramping up and down other power plants, often fossil fuel-based. Those plants operate less efficiently as a result and emit higher levels of greenhouse gases. What’s more, every ridgeline development requires clear-cutting hundreds of acres of forest – a carbon dioxide sink – to make way for tower pads, transmission lines and access roads. A poor trade-off for 25 years of intermittent power.

These massive projects are not about being “green,” they’re about making money, much of it from government subsidies. For the Lowell project, Green Mountain Power expects to reap $46 million in production tax credits and millions more through the sale of renewable energy credits. Public money would be far better spent in support of small, decentralized renewable energy projects that directly power the community where the project is sited. This would lead to higher cuts in greenhouse gas emissions and lower environmental costs.

We still have largely pristine mountains in this state because of the wisdom of an earlier generation of Vermonters. At stake today are at least 200 miles of ridgeline. Don’t let future generations point to ours as the generation that sold out Vermont’s soul.

Suzanna Jones

Walden

Source:  Times Argus, www.timesargus.com 12 November 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon