LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Time we had independent checks on renewables data 

Credit:  www.heraldscotland.com 10 October 2011 ~~

I was not surprised to read that Prof Ian Morton, Senior Partner, Engineer Solutions, the lead author of the report by the Institution of Mechanical Engineers (IMechE) which was so critical of the Scottish Government’s renewables-based energy policy, found it difficult to obtain any really accurate data from Government sources (Letters, November 8).

As a technically-aware layperson I have written to Scottish Ministers with the most basic of questions about renewable energy and the future of energy in Scotland. Some of the replies were almost derisory and, worse, seemed to show the person appointed to reply on behalf of a Minister was far from capable of doing so. I have even had replies where the writer did not seem to know their mega-watts (MW) from their mega-watt hours (MWh) nor the difference between capacity and consumption.

The lack of transparency, broad-brush percentages and soundbites from the Scottish Government needs to stop. It is time accurate data is supplied and scrutinised by truly independent experts so that we can all see where the Scottish Government’s 2011 routemap for renewable energy in Scotland, with its targets of meeting an equivalent of 100% demand for electricity by renewable energy by 2020 and 11% renewable heat, is taking us and at what cost.

With tidal and wave generation hardly out of the starting blocks, ever more wind turbines will have to be constructed to meet targets, with any surplus power sold to England at an extremely discounted price. Existing conventional power plant, despite its age, together with new conventional plant, will be needed to meet actual demand and provide back-up for wind. The result will be even higher emission levels and soaring electricity bills. Maybe it is time for less bluster from Alex Salmond and more heed to the experts?

Neil McKinnon,

Tulchan, Glenalmond, Perth.

Source:  www.heraldscotland.com 10 October 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon