LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Pilots’ lives could be put at risk by wind turbines, claims flying club 

Credit:  By Jamie Buchan, The Press & Journal, 10 November 2011 ~~

Plans to build wind turbines near a northeast aerodrome could put pilots’ lives at risk, a local flying club has claimed.

A bid for two green energy masts on the outskirts of Peterhead are facing rejection after concerns about their potentially deadly impact on small aircraft travelling to and from Longside Airfield.

Developer Jim Mackintosh wants to fit the 150ft turbines near his home at Mains of Buthlaw, Glendaveny.

Unlike other schemes, the proposals have garnered no objections from residents and have been backed by, among others, Aberdeen Airport, the Civil Aviation Authority and the Ministry of Defence, which runs the nearby RAF Buchan surveillance base at Stirlinghill.

North-east Aviators, the group which leases Longside Airfield, has tabled a bid to block the plan, however.

In a letter to the local authority, vice- chairman Walter Oswald said: “Our main concern is one of safety.

“Any high obstacle close to the airfield will form a hazard to aircraft.”

He said if a plane hit a mast it could result in a “fatal accident”.

The earmarked site is less than a mile from the aerodrome, which was previously used by the Royal Air Force and is operated by CHS Scotia.

Aberdeenshire Council planners have called for the scheme to be rejected based on its potential impact on airfield users.

Buchan area councillors this week agreed to visit the site before ruling on planning permission.

Peterhead South councillor Sam Coull called for the scheme to be rejected.

He said: “This might not be such a problem for pilots from the area, who are familiar with the layout of the land.

“But there are many visitors to Longside who won’t know the area as well and this could be a real hazard for them.”

Councillors voted seven to two in favour of a site visit.

They are expected to make a decision on planning consent before year.

Mr Mackintosh said last night: “It has been very frustrating.

“The airfield runway goes from east to west and our turbines are to the north, so I can’t see what the problem is.

“These are only small masts compared to other ones which have been approved nearby.”

Source:  By Jamie Buchan, The Press & Journal, 10 November 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky