[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Antrim nixes wind farm restrictions  

Credit:  By MEGHAN PIERCE, Union Leader Correspondent, www.unionleader.com 9 November 2011 ~~

ANTRIM – Voters defeated two articles Tuesday that would have regulated large-scale wind energy projects in the town.

Almost 50 percent, or 810, of the town’s 1,649 registered voters cast ballots at the special Town Meeting vote.

The first article, which asked voters to adopt a large-scale wind ordinance, failed 501 to 309. The second article, which would have limited any large-scale wind development from the town’s Rural Conservation District, failed 584 to 225.

A large wind energy project proposed in the Rural Conservation District on Tuttle Hill and Willard Mountain by Eolian Renewable Energy was the driving force behind the ordinance, even though in June the town lost jurisdiction of the project to the state Site Evaluation Committee.

The ordinance would not have applied to the project, however, passage of it would have meant the SEC would have taken the town regulations into consideration when reviewing Eolian’s application, which is to be submitted in January.

Brian Beihl was one of the residents lined up outside Town Hall Tuesday afternoon, holding signs.

“An ordinance needs to be in place,” Beihl said. “If this was a Walmart that wanted to come to town, the town has an ordinance that says how high it can be, how much parking there is, how much parking can go in and out. So why is it the town of Antrim would not have an ordinance to govern the largest industrial facility since the 1870s?” he said.

Currently, Eolian is planning to present the state with an application for a 30-megawatt production capacity facility that would include 10 turbines along the Tuttle and Willard mountain ridge lines.

Steve MacDonald of nearby West Street held a printed sign held by many others that said, “A NO vote is a Yes for Wind!”

“The intent of the proposed ordinance is not to regulate with, but to make sure it doesn’t happen,” MacDonald said. “It’s far too restrictive. As proposed I think it represents a minority of the town and there are things in it that I think are not good policy.”

Most of the Rural Conservations District is undeveloped, generating very little property tax revenue for the town, he said.

This project would bring approximately $300,000 to Antrim, MacDonald said.

Selectman John Robertson said the town is still negotiating with Eolian, but said the company would make a payment in lieu of taxes to the town.

The articles, drafted by an ad hoc committee and approved by the Planning Board after a public hearing process, were opposed by the Select Board for being too restrictive.

“My personal feeling is – this one selectman’s is – renewable energy is the thing of the future, so it’s got to start somewhere,” Robertson said. “Someday there’s going to be no oil if we keep pumping it out of the earth.”

[rest of article available at source]
Source:  By MEGHAN PIERCE, Union Leader Correspondent, www.unionleader.com 9 November 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter