[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

when your community is targeted


RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Lenox wind turbine study in gear 

Credit:  By Clarence Fanto, Berkshire Eagle Staff, www.berkshireeagle.com 5 November 2011 ~~

LENOX – The six-member town committee created to research and report to the Select Board whether a potential municipal wind-turbine project on Lenox Mountain should be submitted to voters is churning at high speed following its first meeting.

Committee members and any interested members of the public will tour the site at the corner of Reservoir and Dunbar Roads beginning at 1 this afternoon; the panel will then meet at Town Hall to discuss their findings.

Committee members who support and oppose the project, evenly divided at three in each camp, staked out their territory at the early-morning meeting on Monday, listing the potential benefits of the project and compiling a long list of environmental impacts and safety concerns.

The issues that panel members want to explore are based on the site study by alternative-energy company Weston Solutions, Inc., submitted to the town last May. The report described a westward-facing ridge line near the summit of the 1,900 mountain as “viable” for one or two 262-foot-high turbines that could produce enough energy to power town buildings.

Non-voting moderator Kenneth Fowler, a Select Board member, described the panel as “one of the most important committees we’ve formed.”

“This is a tough job for us,” he acknowledged.

Panel member Channing Gibson, a Lenox resident and a former Hollywood-based TV and film producer who leans against wind-turbine projects, emphasized the importance of “knowing what’s going to happen at the site up there, who controls it.”

“When somebody else is in charge, are they going to be in charge of fire, liability… If roads are destroyed in the process of building the thing, who’s going to be in charge of that?” he asked. “Those are big concerns.”

“Looking broadly across different projects at different sites, you learn different things about different issues that might be important to us,” said Jo Anne Magee, an alternate committee member. Her husband, MIT professor Christopher Magee, is a panel member who was unable to attend on Monday.

Among the key issues committee members identified are the impact on neighboring communities, the pros and cons of municipal ownership versus leasing turbines from a private developer, and whether the specifics in the Weston Solutions report are reliable.

“I see numbers in the Weston report that just don’t compute,” Gibson declared. “We’ve got to vet it out. I want to make sure the benefits are discussed very clearly.”

He also cited environmental and safety issues – fire, lightning, interference with FAA electronics, ice throw, noise, road impact stemming from construction, proximity to residents, the effects on Pleasant Valley Wildlife Sanctuary and the watershed – as well as potential fallout affecting property values and tourism.

“An important piece is economic benefits, understanding where we are as a town in terms of our own finances, the economics of the project and how it might eventually benefit our town and the alternative,” said Eric Vincelette, a wind-energy supporter who’s also on the Lenox Finance Committee.

Fowler wanted to insure “adequate public input” in the discussion.

“I think we’ve learned that lesson,” he said.

Members of the committee discussed other turbine sites that might be visited, including Brodie Mountain and Jiminy Peak, Falmouth on Cape Cod and Princeton, in Worcester County near Leominster.

“It’s really critical that the projects visited be similar in nature,” suggested Adele Gravitz, the town’s sustainability coordinator.

“I want to make sure we’re looking at municipal projects, not 30-turbine wind farms,” said Jamie Cahillane, a wind-energy proponent who is a member of the Lenox Environmental Committee. “We want to compare apples to apples.”

Source:  By Clarence Fanto, Berkshire Eagle Staff, www.berkshireeagle.com 5 November 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)


e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon