[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Council approves landfill wind turbine; Noise pollution negligible, city says  

Credit:  By Jeremy Warren, The StarPhoenix, www.thestarphoenix.com 12 October 2011 ~~

Huffing and puffing from Montgomery Place residents couldn’t blow down the city’s plan to build a wind turbine at the Saskatoon landfill as city council voted to approve the project Tuesday night.

Councillors approved a city administration request to seek proposals for the design and construction of an 80-metre tall wind turbine at the landfill. Three councillors – Pat Lorje, Darren Hill and Tiffany Paulsen – voted against the proposal.

With the approval, the city administration will send out a request-for-proposals for the $5-million project. The city plans to have the turbine running by January 2013.

Some residents of Montgomery Place, which borders the landfill, had written letters and spoke at council Tuesday night to express their concern about adverse health effects of a turbine in their neighbourhood. Coun. Pat Lorje read a prepared statement outlining her opposition to the project.

“I feel like I’m fighting a losing battle because as soon as you announce a project is green everybody stands and salutes the flag,” Lorje said.

One of her concerns centred on environmental assessment reports that have yet to be made public. Stantec Consulting has completed an environmental assessment requested by Environment Canada, and although preliminary results indicate a turbine could harm the gull population and that some mitigation measures might be required to reduce the risk for some bat species, the report won’t be available until December.

“Before we make a decision of this magnitude, we should have all the reports tabled,” Lorje said. “This is not a responsible way to make reasonable decisions for the people of Saskatoon.”

The $5-million project is partly funded by the provincial and federal governments, which have pledged $2.35 million in funding. The city has already spent $530,000 on consulting and assessment work.

Approving the city administration’s request would allow the project to be finished by the March 13, 2013 deadline set for projects funded by the federal-provincial funding agreement. Waiting for the environmental assessment reports to be tabled could mean the city would miss its deadline and not qualify for funding, according to the city administration.

Saskatoon Light and Power has been studying the project’s feasibility – including wind and foundation stability tests – since 2006. The wind turbine concept used by the city would have a capacity of two megawatts, which would power about 500 homes. The annual 3,000 tonne reduction in greenhouse gas emissions is the equivalent of removing 600 vehicles from Saskatoon streets, according to the city.

The city’s proposal addresses the health concerns by dismissing the work of one researcher often cited by people opposed to wind turbines. “‘Wind Turbine Syndrome’ is not a recognized diagnosis in the medical community, and there are no unique symptoms or combinations of symptoms that would lead to this hypothesized disorder,” the city report states.

The report also states that noise generated by the proposed wind turbine is far less than the 60-decibel level known to cause fatigue and sleep deprivation. The worstcase noise level for the nearest residence is 37 decibels, similar to the background noise level in a quiet bedroom, the report states.

The city’s turbine will be setback 700 metres from the nearest residence, significantly more than the 550-metre distance used in the world’s most stringent guidelines, the report said.

Source:  By Jeremy Warren, The StarPhoenix, www.thestarphoenix.com 12 October 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.