[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Support Article 9  

Credit:  By Mark Cool, Falmouth Patch, patch.com 26 September 2011 ~~

Citizens beware when green ideology clouds science, and regulatory compliance distracts public health judgment.

In a letter dated Sept. 8, Alicia McDevitt, state Department of Environmental Protection deputy commissioner, wrote to town Selectmen that MA DEP would fund and staff would collect data on noise created by Wind 1, Falmouth’s municipal Industrial Wind Turbine (IWT). This is good news for residents around Blacksmith Shop Road. However, Selectmen shouldn’t be so quick to put their eggs all in one basket.

An incriminating memorandum on wind turbine noise, prepared by the Ontario provincial government, shows that government officials were well aware that noise from IWT’s operating, even in compliance with Ontario’s wind turbine regulations, were causing adverse effects on communities.

Falmouth’s fall Town Meeting will soon be in the throes of debate on Town Meeting Article 9 (to suspend town wind turbine operations). The concerning health effects imposed on neighbors, recognized by the Ontario provincial government amongst others, is why Article 9 is on the warrant after all.

The question not yet addressed by State “experts,” not to mention town Selectmen or Board of Health, is why the many characteristics of wind turbine noise, not identified in the MADEP regulations, are not factored into the equation assessing tolerable turbine noise levels. Without addressing this question, all best intentions, all state funds and studies, all compliance conclusions may still offer no relief for neighbors.

Citizens beware when green ideology clouds science, and regulatory compliance distracts public health judgment. It will be telling indeed, if Town officials, at Town Meeting, punctuate the associated cost of temporarily shutting off the machines. Will “they” inconceivably suggest the preference of wind profit over the personal health of citizens?

Town Meeting is our tradition of trying to make Falmouth a better community. A better community isn’t measured by pounds of CO2 eliminated or dollars in the town till. Trying to make Falmouth a better community starts by asking accurate questions, all the while resisting harmful ideologic and political influence, demanding honest medical proof, and working together to make wise decisions and policies. Please support your neighbors, support Article 9, and urge officials to stop avoiding the “real” question.

Source:  By Mark Cool, Falmouth Patch, patch.com 26 September 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.