[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Rumford board to wait for state to decide wind standards 

Credit:  By Terry Karkos, Staff Writer, Sun Journal, www.sunjournal.com 8 September 2011 ~~

RUMFORD – Selectmen at Wednesday night’s Wind Ordinance workshop took a wait-and-see approach to setting sound and safety standards.

They decided to await a decision by the Maine Board of Environmental Protection that may come from the Augusta board’s meeting on Thursday, Sept. 15.

That came after Selectman Jeff Sterling read a letter from Rumford businessman Roger Arsenault, who said the state BEP is considering setting stricter standards.

Arsenault asked them to table Wednesday night’s discussion to await the state’s determination.

“We couldn’t wait forever on this, but it might be of value to see where the state is going on this, if there’s some sort of time frame figured into it,” Sterling said.

“But one of the things we talked about last time was waiting on the state to come up with standards.”

“There was a lot of legislation that was pending from January through June and none of it, at this point, has made it through,” he said. “And I think all but one never made it out of the committee.”

Still, Sterling suggested waiting for direction from the state.

Town Manager Carlo Puiia said that once a permit is drawn, that’s the standard to which it would adhere.

“So if the state changes the standard after we adopt an ordinance and the permit was already drawn” whatever the state did wouldn’t matter, he said.

When asked by the board, Albert Aniel of Mexico said the state BEP will take up the matter at its meeting Thursday, Sept. 15. But he couldn’t say whether they’d make a determination.

Selectman Brad Adley asked Aniel and a handful of regular workshop attendees what the BEP is reviewing. Arsenault replied, “Everything.”

“Let’s give them the benefit of the doubt to see what they come up with, but we can’t wait forever,” Adley said. “There’s a lot more wiser minds there.”

The board then moved into the next agenda item, that of determining a safety setback should a wind turbine fall over or its blades throw chunks of ice.

Board Chairman Greg Buccina suggested going with 150 percent of the turbine height when the blade is at its highest above the grade.

Sterling put that into perspective basing that on a 400-foot-tall turbine, saying the setback would be 600 feet, providing a 200-foot buffer.

Aniel, who was concerned for snowmobile safety, said that wasn’t nearly enough. He said wind turbine blades can throw ice from 1,200 feet to 1,500 feet.

Buccina reconsidered, saying he’d like the setback farther back.

“I think it would eliminate a lot of repercussions like from sound,” he said.

Former Selectman Jim Thibodeau asked for a minimum of 2,500 feet.

He said he wasn’t so much concerned about safety as he was about wind turbines rendering his land useless.

“The sound setback may render the safety setback moot,” Sterling said.

“Is 2,000 a good number?” Adley asked.

“I’d like to see it higher, but the abutting landowner has the right to waive that,” Selectman Jeremy Volkernick said.

“Twenty-five hundred got voted down in November, 675 got voted down in June. In simple terms, that’s where we’re at,” Adley said.

He referred to the first ordinance, which was largely considered too restrictive and was defeated in November, and the second ordinance that was largely considered too permissive.

Sterling suggested waiting for guidance from the BEP, Aniel agreed and so, too, did the board.

Selectmen then asked if Aniel, Arsenault or Peter Buotte Jr. would tell them what the BEP decides next week, rather than seek the information themselves.

Source:  By Terry Karkos, Staff Writer, Sun Journal, www.sunjournal.com 8 September 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky