[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

The winds of change  

Credit:  Elko Daily Free Press, elkodaily.com 17 August 2011 ~~

Should neighbors be upset about a 66-foot wind turbine going up on a two-acre lot? Or should they be thankful it isn’t a 135-foot wind turbine on a one-acre lot?

The taller wind towers on smaller lots were originally considered by Elko County last fall as commissioners prepared to pass an ordinance setting restrictions on the alternative energy machines. The action followed passage of a state law that prevents local governments from passing “unreasonable” restrictions on windmills.

Few residents came out of the woodwork to comment on the county ordinance when it was under consideration – probably because at that point it was only a vague abstraction and not a matter of something being built above anyone’s fence line. The Spring Creek Association got involved because the state law put into question its Declaration of Reservations limiting any accessory structures to 30 feet.

By the time the county ordinance was passed this spring the 135-foot tower restriction had shrunk to a maximum 66 feet.

The issue for residents of Spring Creek, as well as outlying areas around the city of Elko, is largely about obstructing views and creating noise. SCA board member Bob Collyer wrote last fall that, “A 135-foot turbine could easily interfere with views, aesthetic values and cause some noise disturbance. The idea of each lot over one acre possibly having a wind turbine this size is certainly cause for concern.”

Local Realtors also weighed in on the ordinance, with Paul Bottari stating that “135-foot wind turbines could affect the quiet enjoyment of your property,” and that residents should have a say about what goes up in a neighbor’s backyard.

More than a dozen neighbors protested the application on Sundance Drive, an area not far from an even more bitter dispute over development of an apartment complex. In both cases there was much acrimony over government “ignoring” their wishes.

Part of the problem may stem from confusion over the concept of a “conditional use permit.” Property owners are not free to do whatever they want with their property. Some uses are flat-out prohibited, while others are clearly allowed. In between are uses that are allowed only after an official review of standards, such as those that were set by the county’s wind machine ordinance.

When a developer or a family applies for a conditional use permit they are entitled to have it approved if it meets the standards set by the governing board. The county’s wind machine ordinance, for example, is excruciatingly specific about what kind of device is allowed.

If the ordinance is indeed less restrictive than intended, as Commissioner Charlie Myers suggests and as Sundance neighbors suspect, then the code could be changed at a future date to apply to any future permit applications.

In the meantime, property owners should keep in mind that any use allowed under a conditional use permit could end up becoming a reality right next door. The best way to avoid unpleasant surprises is to be involved in civic affairs and to stay abreast of any changes proposed by government at any level.


Members of the Elko Daily Free Press editorial board are John Pfeifer, Jeffry Mullins and Marianne Kobak McKown.

Source:  Elko Daily Free Press, elkodaily.com 17 August 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.