| Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
Wind farm objection could be withdrawn
Credit: Stornoway Gazette, www.stornowaygazette.co.uk 16 August 2011 ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
RSPB Scotland has today taken the unusual step of issuing an objection to a windfarm proposal that it hopes to be able to drop if the applicant meets a few small conditions.
Lewis Wind Power, a joint venture between AMEC and EDF Energy, has applied to build a 42-turbine wind farm to the west of Stornoway on the Western Isles.
The applicant has made considerable efforts to find a site that is suitable for a wind farm, recognising that the Western Isles are of exceptionally high nature conservation interest.
But due to unresolved concerns about the possible effects of the scheme on golden eagles – a species for which the Lewis Peatlands Special Protection Area (SPA) immediately next to the proposed development is designated – the conservation charity still has some concerns.
In particular the site could lead to the loss of golden eagles through collision or displacement. Black-throated diver, an even rarer UK breeding species, may also be adversely impacted.
A spokesman for RSPB Scotland said: “The exceptional importance of the Western Isles for breeding birds means that any proposals which may threaten them deserve very close scrutiny. We have been unable to verify the applicant’s assessment of the impacts of proposals using information in the environmental statement, so we have requested additional information from the developer, but this has not yet been forthcoming.
“It is likely that this concern could be resolved, subject to a detailed examination of the data we require. We have indicated that we believe a windfarm could be located here, provided a few of the turbines posing the biggest risk are either relocated or removed, and a thorough reassessment of the remaining impact shows them to be within acceptable limits.”
The spokesman added: “At present RSPB Scotland objects to the proposals, but we hope to be able to reconsider that objection soon in the event of relatively minor changes to layout and a reassessment of the impacts.”
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
| Wind Watch relies entirely on User Contributions |
 (via Stripe) |
 (via Paypal) |
Share:
[ Short URL: https://wind-watch.org/news/?p=11981 ]
