[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Ninth Circuit allows Nevada wind farm construction to proceed 

Credit:  Source: Shook, Hardy & Bacon LLP ca.linexlegal.com 29 July 2011 ~~

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has affirmed a district court decision that allowed the construction of a Nevada wind farm, rejecting claims that the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) violated NEPA in approving its construction. W. Watersheds Project v. BLM, No. 11-15799 (9th Cir. 7/15/11) (unpublished). The wind farm project would involve the construction of more than 75 wind turbines, more than 25 miles of new roads, nine miles of fencing, two gravel pits, a microwave tower with overhead electrical lines, and other facilities. In their complaint, plaintiffs alleged that BLM neglected to finish a complete analysis under NEPA and that the wind farm’s construction would have a significant impact on the environment, including wildlife such as golden eagles, bats, sage grouse, and rare plants. The complaint sought both preliminary and permanent injunctions. The district court denied plaintiffs’ bid for a preliminary injunction, finding that they were unlikely to succeed on their NEPA claim and that allowing the wind farm to proceed would not cause irreparable harm. Plaintiffs unsuccessfully appealed to the Ninth Circuit. In a concurring opinion, however, one judge disagreed that plaintiffs would not prevail under NEPA, finding that “BLM failed adequately to consider the potentially significant cumulative impacts of the project and other reasonably foreseeable future actions.” Still, she concurred in the outcome because she found that the actual construction of the wind farm would not likely cause irreparable harm to either sage grouse or bats.

Source:  Source: Shook, Hardy & Bacon LLP ca.linexlegal.com 29 July 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky