LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wind turbines High Court hearing: Julian Davis claims anti-wind farm circus suggestion is ‘typical’ of his family’s treatment 

Credit:  www.spaldingtoday.co.uk 18 July 2011 ~~

Julian Davis, who is suing over alleged “nightmare” noise nuisance from nearby wind turbines has hit back against claims he and his wife “exaggerated” how bad it was.

Mr Davis told London’s High Court he “couldn’t live with the noise” from turbines near their former home, Grays Farm, Deeping St Nicholas – which the couple say they had to move out of four years ago.

Mr Davis and his wife, Jane, are suing landowners RC Tinsley Ltd, Nicholas Watts, Fenland Windfarms Ltd and Fenland Green Power Cooperative Ltd.

They are seeking either a permanent injunction to shut down the turbines or damages of up to £2.5million.

Giving evidence before Mr Justice Hickinbottom on Friday, Mr Davis said suggestions the couple were part of an “anti-wind farm circus” summed up the way they had been treated.

Peter Harrison QC, for the couple, said they had been accused of “travelling the country, misleading the public and exaggerating any effects they may have experienced”.

Mr Davis told the judge: “These were the exact sentiments we were subjected to.”

Asked if he could live with the noise, he said: “No, I couldn’t”.

Mr Davis also said he was “shocked” when the couple were asked if they were receiving any funding towards their legal costs from anti-wind farm campaigners.

The defendants in the High Court case deny creating any noise nuisance and suggest that the couple may have become “unduly sensitive” to the sound of the turbines.

The hearing continues.

Source:  www.spaldingtoday.co.uk 18 July 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky