[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Ugly wind farms mar the Kansas Plains  

Credit:  Tim Tankard, Midwest Voices contributing columnist, voices.kansascity.com 15 July 2011 ~~

We’ve all heard the saying, “Be careful what you wish for, you may get it.” I love the great outdoors as much as the next guy and figured the use of windmills for electrical power was a good idea.

It sure seemed to beat coal, big dams or nuclear power. Until I visited the Smoky Hills in central Kansas.

I’ve always treasured the Smoky Hills – craggy limestone bluffs, timbered draws and wide-open pastures. But go now and expect to encounter scores of white whirling windmills, covering the land in all directions.

What was once beautiful prairie looks ruined. It’s as if there is a monstrous cell tower on every acre, with spinning blades atop.

The Smoky Hills project was constructed by the Italian firm Enel, and although there were folks who questioned the deal, they found themselves trumped by the unusual collaboration of big business and so-called “environmentalists.” The politicians and media jumped into the ring with both feet.

The director of economic development in Lincoln County even said, “We think it is going to be a tourism attraction.” He wasn’t joking.

Last week Duke Energy announced they’re building a similar-sized wind farm on 16,000 acres near Dodge City, with the output going to Kansas City Power & Light Co. This makes KCP&L happy, not so much for the meager amount of electricity it will produce but because four years ago the company signed a pledge with the Sierra Club to add 400 megawatts of wind power to its energy grid.

I’ve got no complaints with the ranchers who stand to make a little money off the leases, and in the short term all that construction pays good wages and sells pancakes at the local cafes. But take a look at the real financers and you’ll run into folks like T. Boone Pickens, the old corporate raider.

Mister T. was one of the big guns behind wind farms, smartly taking advantage of government subsidies. He even proposed the “Pickens Plan,” which would spend up to $1 trillion on wind turbines stretching from Texas to Montana. Yet on his ranch in Texas, Mr. Pickens won’t allow them.

“They’re ugly,” he once noted. “The hub of each turbine is 280 feet, and then you have a 120-foot radius on the blade. It’s the size of a 40-story building.”

Recently, Pickens has backed off his wind energy dreams and has moved on to gas, which seems apropos. Word has it he’s trying to unload his extra wind turbines in Canada. As Kermit the Frog knows, it’s not easy being green. When it comes to extracting energy from Mother Earth, you pick your poison. We used to live in Farmington, N.M., near two large power plants and an open-pit coal mine. They weren’t pretty, but compared to those windmills the limited land damage of a coal mine and power plant look rather appealing. They are certainly more efficient.

With the wind blowing, the 16,000 acres of turbines near Dodge will produce 131 megawatts. Just south of Kansas City, the La Cygne power plant can produce 10 times that power. Without government tax credits nobody would be building wind farms because they cost more to construct and maintain than they will ever return in electricity.

Before we wrap the western half of Kansas in wind turbines, let’s look at what we’re doing here. Don’t take my word for it, go see for yourself.

Pack a picnic basket and take a drive out west into the high plains, just past Salina. And be a good tourist, get out of your car and check it out.

But be sure to gas up because after stopping in the Smoky Hills, you may tire of those whining white machines, and want to drive on farther west, to where the prairie becomes Kansas again.

Source:  Tim Tankard, Midwest Voices contributing columnist, voices.kansascity.com 15 July 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.