[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind farm plan gets green light in Vermilion County  

Credit:  Tracy Moss, The News-Gazette, www.news-gazette.com 13 July 2011 ~~

DANVILLE – The Vermilion County Board authorized construction of the first wind turbine farm in the county Tuesday night despite objections from several local residents and incomplete information in the developer’s application.

The 27-member board voted 21-1, with four members absent and one seat vacant, to grant Chicago-based Invenergy a building permit to construct 104 wind turbines in west central Vermilion County.

Invenergy also submitted on July 1 its application to the Champaign County zoning board for a special-use permit to build 30 wind turbines as part of the same project in east central Champaign County. Invenergy officials said they hope construction in Vermilion County can start by the end of the year.

The lone no vote at Tuesday’s Vermilion County Board meeting came from member Terry Stal, D-District 4, who said after the meeting that he voted that way because the county should have all its agreements with Invenergy in place before the permit is issued. He said his vote reflected a procedural objection.

Although he voted “yes,” board member John Alexander also took issue with the fact that some parts of the application were not complete or that information, such as maps showing transmission lines, was provided by the company only the day before the meeting. Alexander asked that the board delay the process to allow time for gathering the additional information and the public to review that information, which is required by the county’s ordinance.

Invenergy still does not have road agreements in place with local governmental bodies that will stipulate exactly what the company is responsible for in regard to either upgrading or maintaining local roads that will be affected by the increased traffic and heavy loads during construction and operation of the wind turbines. Also, the ordinance requires that the turbines receive design certification, but Invenergy officials explained that it’s a lengthy, ongoing process that’s not yet finished.

Bill Donahue, corporate counsel for the county, explained that the county’s permit has several conditions attached that require Invenergy to have a completed road agreement and turbine design certification in place before any construction can begin, and the county’s structural safety committee felt that it had enough information from Invenergy to recommend issuing the permit. The committee vote 7-0 last week that the permit be issued by the county.

Residents who objected to the project during the structural safety committee hearing last week again expressed their objections and opinions to the full county board Tuesday night during the public comment portion of the meeting. Several residents spoke, some in favor and some against, including Darrell and Kim Cambron of rural Rankin, who asked that the board take more time to investigate potential safety concerns of wind turbines, including noise pollution, shadow flicker and effects on wildlife. Other members of the public expressed their objection to wind energy in general, including Bill Ingram of Danville, who told the board that wind is more costly than other forms of energy, partly due to government subsidies.

Kirstin Replogle of Urbana spoke as a member of the Sierra Club and told the board the club is in favor of the project, not only because it is a move toward cleaner energy but also because it will create jobs and government revenue. She said it won’t completely replace other forms of energy, but wind energy needs to be a part of the future.

“We think this is a good idea,” she said.

Source:  Tracy Moss, The News-Gazette, www.news-gazette.com 13 July 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.