[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Village votes ‘no’ to threat of turbines  

Credit:  Teesdale Mercury, www.teesdalemercury.co.uk 12 July 2011 ~~

A poll of people living in Woodland has returned a resounding ‘no’ to wind turbines being put up near their village.
Woodland Parish Council sent out voting forms to all households in the village giving people the chance to have their say on controversial plans to erect five or six turbines at Windy Banks, just south of Hamsterley Forest.
Tow Law firm Banks Renewables has been carrying out a feasibility study to determine if the site is suitable for the turbines but as yet no plans have been submitted to Durham County Council.
But residents have been expressing their fears since the study began. Cliff Harding, chairman of Hamsterley Parish Council, said he and his fellow councillors wanted to give the public a formal way to express their views.
The opinion cards were collected last Friday and 37 per cent of the leaflets given out were returned. Of these, 64.2 per cent said they did not want wind turbines built at Windy Banks.
Mr Harding said: “I think opinion was reasonably represented and it is a sufficient number to take consideration of. I thought both of the recent exhibitions given by Hamsterley and Upper Gaunless Action Group (Hugag) and Banks were well presented but the results show that people were not convinced by Banks’ argument.”
Mark Dowdall, environment and community director at Banks Group, said the company’s experience of postal polls was that they did not represent the views of the whole community. He said Banks had been working with an independent research company and results showed only 24 per cent of residents were opposed to the proposals at Windy Bank.
Of the 160 forms sent out by the parish council, 61 were returned with 120 registered opinions.
Mr Harding said the council would now formulate a response which would be made public once Banks Renewables formerly submit the planning application.
He said: “We feel we can’t make a response until we know exactly what it is Banks’ are proposing.
“But I have to add that the parish council is only part of the decision making process and it will be Durham County Council’s planning committee that will be making the decision. But this has give us the opportunity to see exactly what villagers’ opinions are.”

Source:  Teesdale Mercury, www.teesdalemercury.co.uk 12 July 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.