| Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
Windflow dream fades as shares plunge
Credit: Chris Hutching, The National Business Review, www.nbr.co.nz 6 July 2011 ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Windflow Technology (NZX: WTL) has abandoned its local manufacturing plans, its share price has plunged to 50c, and it wants more money from shareholders.
From a high of $3.75 in late 2007, a series of increasingly disappointing reports about installation problems and cost overruns has seen a collapse in the fortunes of the company.
After building more than 100 turbines at the Mandeville Street, Christchurch facility the engineering assembly team has been made redundant.
The company’s latest newsletter said that Windflow will now focus on international licencing for its intellectual property as the best way to realise shareholder value. If the company can attract an overseas partner, manufacturing will move offshore.
This marks a departure from the Windlfow modus operandi that attracted many of its green-leaning shareholders and made it the darling of politicians like Jeanette Fitzsimons and Helen Clark.
Inventor and managing director Geoff Henderson was determined to establish a Kiwi-owned and operated employer.
But the latest message to shareholders points out that the market for wind turbines in New Zealand is nearly exhausted in terms of availability and suitability of sites.
“Wind farm activity overall is stagnant and decreasing with several very large farms still in the consenting process. Those that are consented, are not being built as overall electricity demand is down.”
Windflow is now promoting itself in the UK while still working towards securing orders in New Zealand in discussions with cornerstone shareholder Mighty River Power regarding the consented Long Gully site with potential for 25 turbines.
The proposed Mt Cass wind farm in north Canterbury could take around 70 Windflow turbines but depends on an Environment Court hearing at the end of June.
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
| Wind Watch relies entirely on User Contributions |
 (via Stripe) |
 (via Paypal) |
Share:
[ Short URL: https://wind-watch.org/news/?p=10623 ]
