[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Mast ranks celebrate as turbine bid rejected  

Credit:  Yorkshire Post, www.yorkshirepost.co.uk 17 June 2011 ~~

Controversial plans to carry out research for a multi-million pound wind farm on the outskirts of York have been blocked by councillors.

Developers from a green energy firm, Banks Renewables, had submitted a planning application to York Council to place a 230ft wind monitoring mast at the village of Copmanthorpe.

But members of the council’s west and city centre area planning sub-committee yesterday refused to grant permission for the mast, which would have helped to select the most suitable site for the wind farm.

More than 100 members of the public were at the Guildhall for the meeting.

The planning sub-committee’s deputy chairman, Coun Ian Gillies, was instrumental in blocking the application after proposing it should be refused.

Coun Gillies, who is the chairman of the council’s Tory group, said: “The protection of green belt land should always be a priority, and this would have been a completely inappropriate development. This is also a victory for the people living nearby who had voiced very serious concerns about the plans.”

Banks Renewables had drawn up proposals to build up to five 475ft turbines, each costing £2.5m, at Copmanthorpe, as well as another wind farm at Hunmanby, near Filey. The Copmanthorpe wind farm would generate enough electricity each year to power about 8,300 homes.

An application for a monitoring mast at Hunmanby was refused in April by Scarborough Borough Council, although Banks Renewables has announced it is appealing the decision.

The development director at Banks Renewables, Phil Dyke, claimed the firm was “very disappointed” with York Council’s decision.

He added: “We will now await confirmation of the exact reasons for this decision before deciding on our next steps.”

Source:  Yorkshire Post, www.yorkshirepost.co.uk 17 June 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.